View Single Post
  #5118  
Old Posted May 3, 2019, 4:46 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,710
Quote:
Originally Posted by lzppjb View Post
To be fair, you said, "its linear, along-the-lake density pattern."

wwmiv said, "it isn't just density along the river."

He didn't mention linear at all in his post. He was making the point that I did. Austin's density is growing northward away from the river, albeit at a slower rate.
No point in trying to debate them. Honestly, I should have known better than to contradict someone who knows everything...
__________________
Houston: 2.4m (+3.9%) + MSA suburbs: 5.4m (+12%) + CSA exurbs: 200k (+5%)
Dallas: 1.3m (+2%) / FtW: 1.0m (+10%) + suburbs: 6.4m (9%) + exurbs: 566k (+9%)
San Antonio: 1.5m (+6%) + MSA suburbs: 1.2m (+10%) + CSA exurbs: 82k (+3%)
Austin: 994k (+3%) + MSA suburbs: 1.6m (+18%)
Texas (whole): 31.29m (+7%) / Texas (balance): 8.6m (+3%)
Reply With Quote