View Single Post
  #5043  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2019, 9:30 PM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,710
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Best Forumer View Post
yeah... how come SA doesnt have more of a skyline?
A number of reasons:

(A) lack of corporate presence in industries preferring downtown locations (banking, law, government)

(B) relative lack of historic urban entertainment districts outside of the Riverwalk (the Pearl and San Pedro Creek are tremendous starts, but they need time to mature)

(C) lack of large quantities of middle to upper income young adults, who prefer (at least relative to previous generations) urban living

Luckily, the trend lines in these areas are good. USAA has moved employees downtown, the city is clearly investing in its core, and were attracting new employee talent.

San Antonio will get there and has all the right bones, it just needs another decade for current trends to bear fruit.
__________________
Houston: 2.4m (+3.9%) + MSA suburbs: 5.4m (+12%) + CSA exurbs: 200k (+5%)
Dallas: 1.3m (+2%) / FtW: 1.0m (+10%) + suburbs: 6.4m (9%) + exurbs: 566k (+9%)
San Antonio: 1.5m (+6%) + MSA suburbs: 1.2m (+10%) + CSA exurbs: 82k (+3%)
Austin: 994k (+3%) + MSA suburbs: 1.6m (+18%)
Texas (whole): 31.29m (+7%) / Texas (balance): 8.6m (+3%)
Reply With Quote