Posted May 19, 2018, 7:32 PM
|
 |
All-American City Boy
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hinsdale / Uptown, Chicago
Posts: 1,953
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown
Perfectly illustrating the difference between those who talk about tall buildings
and those who actually build tall buildings.
Buildings become less efficient the higher you go—geometrically so. There's the amount of floorspace required for elevators and exit stairs, the strength of the concrete, the time needed for construction. That's why the Spire went through three iterations, each trying to hang more units on the same set of elevator shafts.
Do you really think Related and SOM didn't run the numbers? Do you think they just picked the floor counts based on the CEO and his daughter's ages?
|
Is all of this encompassed under "premium for height", or does that just apply to structural integrity the higher you go up?
__________________
1. 9 DeKalb Ave - Brooklyn, NYC - SHoP Architects - Photo
2. American Radiator Building - New York City - Hood, Godley, and Fouilhoux - Photo
3. One Chicago Square - Chicago - HPA and Goettsch Partners - Photo
4. Chicago Board of Trade - Chicago - Holabird & Root - Photo
5. Cathedral of Learning - Pittsburgh - Charles Klauder - Photo
|