Quote:
Originally Posted by rgolch
It’s a good location, to be sure. But there are other great locations for development in the city.
|
Yeah and Related has wasted a few of those sites as well.
Quote:
|
Honestly, I’ll reserve judgement on these projects till I see the renderings on Tuesday...Related may have not put it’s best foot forward for it’s Chicago projects thus far
|
So you're reserving judgment but you're aware that they have a penchant for showing us something decent to okay and then diluting it to crap down the road? They don't have a track record for quality...at all. It's not about whether something gets built (we have a lot of that underway already) but whether something good gets built. Related, when they purchased this property, promised that it was going to be a statement piece. Weeks ago it was way taller than 875 feet and going to include terracotta. Now it's glass facade and the height is in the same ballpark as their current project in the area. So really this just seems like more of the same from Related.