Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert.hampton
Your analysis is pretty far off. The architect is Davis Partnership. The architect did not release the rendering early. The self proclaimed developer released the rendering early (by several months if you see the youtube video) and then responded by saying "JK----this isnt in Denver its somewhere else. LOL!" If thats not a misstep I dont know what is. Block 162 is being developed by a nationally recognized developer with a ton of experience in vertical development, so there is zero equivalence to this scenario.
And unless you are involved in the project I don't know why you keep insisting the party calling itself the 'developer' is not in fact the 'developer'.
FWIW I, like everyone else would love to see this project happen. But there is very little to suggest that this 'team' is positioned to do it.
|
Have you ever worked on a major development project? Releasing a a rending early is a fuck up- but of everything that can wrong it is pretty minimal.
Further when a development team: files with the city, takes core samples, goes under contract with a land owner, and hires an architect it reasonable to think the project is moving forward. Is there something I have missed that overshadows these facts?