View Single Post
  #4554  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2016, 1:49 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,710
Okay, so I'm gonna take a contrarian position and say that existing properties that already exhibit great street level interaction should be privileged slightly from redevelopment. I wonder if city officials could build an incentive to develop parking lots rather than existing structures into code? Say, an additional density bonus for lots that are currently non-structure impervious cover? That way, all else equal, development would be slightly redirected to empty lots.

That being said, I'm sure the replacement will be a hell of a lot better than what's there now, even if we loose a little bit of charm.
Reply With Quote