Posted Aug 3, 2016, 7:34 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 472
|
|
The fact that he's seen the problem, and has considered various solutions in a city with similar geographic constraints, is some cause for comfort.
He obviously has ideas, which for whatever reason, were not able to be implemented by SF City Council. We have the same problem here (as does every city, for that matter). During his interview, he must have had plenty of opportunity to articulate those ideas, which I assume sufficiently impressed the selection committee.
He's not the guy I was rooting for, but I'm certainly willing to have an open mind.
|