View Single Post
  #445  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2016, 6:58 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattgrande View Post
I don't think it will change much where there's incumbents, but it's the results like Ward 7's (and Ward 2's circa 2010) that it aims to fix.
But it's the incumbents (i.e. sitting councillors) who have been tasked with implementing this change, and two years in, even the newbies resemble barnacles. Consider the not-unrelated "consultation" around ward boundaries.

See

"[Ward 13 Councillor Arlene VanderBeek] suggested it’s pure speculation to guess what the committee’s recommendations might be, but said her fellow council members are only committed to conducting the review and not to making any changes."

and

At the end of the day, says [Ward 9 Councillor Doug] Conley, it will be council that decides whether or not to change the ward boundaries. “Nobody likes change, especially big change,” he said.


Quote:
Originally Posted by mattgrande View Post
Getting a seat with essentially 20% of the vote is ridiculous.
Even worse: 5% of eligible voters.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan
Reply With Quote