Quote:
Originally Posted by haljackey
While it's not as 'grand' as I hoped, the fact that this bare-bones LRT is moving is huge. Let's hope nothing derails.
|
In the report, it was said that demand in the west was such that LRT there (with its much-higher-capacity vehicles) would likely run only four times hourly for the foreseeable future. That's not good frequency, and it's much more sensible to have buses (in their own lanes with signal priority) running more frequently in terms of ridership building.
I'm surprised to hear the opinion that Wellington couldn't support LRT, though: I would have thought so. But this is great, that hybrid option looks like a great system.
Edit: Maybe someone can explain to me the statement in the article "London is the largest Canadian city without rapid transit." At first, I just thought it was the Free Press saying something that sounded right to them, without checking. How can this statement be correct? Hamilton, for instance, has an express bus (business hours Monday to Friday...). Halifax has MetroLink, but it's essentially a limited-stop route, too. London has limited-stop routes. So how is the Free Press defining "rapid transit"? And how is their statement accurate?