View Single Post
  #7330  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2015, 10:07 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by FFX-ME View Post
I think that the main difference, other than capacity, if the fact that rails can't be moved around so it gives a permanance to the route that buses can't provide. This allows for a densification around the rails and a raise in property values. Trains also bring a positive image of a metropolitain feal. Also, hardly any BRT systems are truly RT since most, like Ottawa's which is often used as an example to the world, have grade crossings.
Edmonton and Calgary's LRTs have grade crossings, do they not count as legitimate RT?

For context, Winnipeg's BRT will, once complete, have roughly a similar proportion of grade separations vs. grade crossings as those LRT systems.