Quote:
Originally Posted by Taeolas
It's also not what E&Y assumably were analyzing, but I'm sure their results will affect what short term solutions are applied as well. Had their report said the status quo would do and this is just a bulge to get through then elements would probably dictate where portables go and how the zones are redistricted. As is, within the full reports are probably clues the District can use to smartly do some easement; but that's not the sort of thing the media would report on.
Otherwise, if all E&Y's report was, amounted to "Build a school", then the district should be suing to get their money back.
|
I agree with that.
I was speaking to a few teachers I know from both local school districts, and all of them told me they where told that this school was build to remedy a previous issue, and also the population growth. Problem with that was that teachers I knew from Hilcrest where saying that they where overflowing with students, and teacher I know from Birchmount where saying they din't understand why they where at that school with so many classes half full. So at that time would it not have made sense despite us being trowing distance from the new school for students from my area all gone to one school. Birchmount., and they would possibly not have the Portables at the new school that was apparently build to remedy the overcrowding.
I think the entire system needs to be changed specially since our numbers are growing fast. I will agree with ( I can't remember her name) she was a teacher for District 2 for a long time. She said that this city was built for road functionality not school system functionality.