View Single Post
  #359  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2015, 5:39 PM
Dr.Z Dr.Z is offline
From the Planning Paradox
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buggys View Post
I'm not sure what you're proposing to encourage intensification within the greenbelt then.
Why not? Balanced doesn't mean zero on one end. My point really though is that if we tried to artificially shift demand by turning off the singles supply via 0 greenfield lands, as I think was suggested above, the unintended consequence would be an increase in housing price for all units. The singles market will take care of itself, mean while we can still encourage intensification all we want.
__________________
"What about the children?! Won't somebody please think of the children!?"

Last edited by Dr.Z; Apr 2, 2015 at 2:13 PM.
Reply With Quote