Quote:
Originally Posted by pilsenarch
^^, and ^... obviously, you guys are not architects....
My critique on the previous page speaks clearly for itself. I have juried competitions and thesis projects at the GSD at Harvard, UIC, and IIT and have also taught at all 3 of those schools among others - I think I can state with confidence that I know how to give a valid critique. If you all want to defend Ms. Gang's proposed tower, that's fine, but I would suggest you focus on the actual work, the shortcomings I have pointed out, and not on accusing me on being on some sort of silly vendetta...
|
Your critique
doesn't speak for itself. That's the problem. Also:
I've witnessed architects far more highly regarded than you participate in the masturbatory shitshow known as the "architecture critique," so don't try to trot out your pedigree as though it confers upon you a cloak of immunity. Take your own advice and allow your critique to speak for itself.