Posted Dec 9, 2014, 4:20 AM
|
 |
ハルウララ
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mylesmalley
I'm speculating, but I bet the cost of environmental remediation played a big part in the decision as well. They know fairly accurately what it will cost, including the demolition today. Regulations change though, and construction/destruction costs increase over time. Moreover, the city had already budgeted for it. Even if it was a big expense, better to do it now where you know what you're in for than to wait a while and get stuck with surprises.
|
Good points all around.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkuta
It's only my humble opinion, but to me a giant open lot like that with the previous infrastructure removed (including remediation) is a pretty nice carrot to dangle in front of potential investors in a new building.
|
Heh. If only this worked in Saint John.
|