View Single Post
  #18  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2014, 2:09 AM
Colin May Colin May is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waye Mason View Post
Keeping the Esso station from falling into that trench might though. EDIT just dug into my notes, the all up early Ekistics proposal, that included full daylighting, revealing the stone bridge that is under Prince Albert Road (paved over) and all the fixings was 15-20 mil. Daylighting by itself would be a big part of that but not the whole cost. Daylighting is problematic where the watercourse runs directly adjacent to buildings built within a few feet of their property lines. I believe the 2 million is to daylight part of the mechanism that is still on the Starrs sight, but not the whole river. I'd love to be wrong though!
The last part is correct. The Walter Regan obsession with putting salmon back in the river and up through the lakes knows no bounds.
Reply With Quote