View Single Post
  #13  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2014, 1:26 AM
MonkeyRonin's Avatar
MonkeyRonin MonkeyRonin is offline
¥ ¥ ¥
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
in terms of income levels, this is absolutely accurate for Toronto. the poorest areas are the inner city suburban areas, usually built in the 1950's and 1960's.

In a very broad sense it's true, but there's still plenty of wealth in the inner suburbs and poverty in the inner city. If I remember correctly, the city's wealthiest census tract is in the Bridle Path, while the poorest is in Regent Park.



http://localnewsresearchproject.ca/2012/...ar-coverage-and-average-family-income-2/



A quick image search shows that most other major North American cities seem to be similar - either with a "favoured quarter" or a mish-mash of income levels. It generally seems to be true that the centre-most and outer-most areas are the wealthier than outer-city and inner-suburban ones, but (obviously) it's not so simple.


Montreal


http://www.learnquebec.ca/en/content/cur...situation_findhousingmontreal/1task.html


New York


http://www.city-data.com/forum/new-york-city/151851-who-makes-most-money-map.html


Boston


http://proximityone.com/lgsd.htm


Chicago


http://www.coloradonewsday.com/national/...s-harp-divide-between-rich-and-poor.html
__________________
Reply With Quote