View Single Post
  #3656  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2014, 8:03 PM
JACKinBeantown's Avatar
JACKinBeantown JACKinBeantown is offline
JACKinBeantown
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 9,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB View Post
Actually I think the waste he was refering to is the investment in Riverside....... I agree we should not "sink" money into Riverside.
I actually would like Riverside to remain... and yes, put the $$ saved from that into 35.

As to 35 vs Boston's big dig...
ToTally worth it.
Changed downtown Boston in the most amazing ways!!!!!!
Love it.
I agree about sinking 35 too, and it should take priority over Riverside. But separating the two possible projects, sinking Riverside would make the park even more amazing.
Reply With Quote