[ScreamingViking]

So they're actually setting up for future development of lands that won't be in the AEGD. The CATCH article made it sound like this proposal was for part of the AEGD.

They rightly flagged the infrastructure service costs though. If something like this were to be approved in the short run, it would affect whatever servicing needs to happen in the first phase of AEGD development. I wasn't aware that the initial stage would be using available capacity - I figured they'd need to spend a bunch on new trunk lines right away.