From the exact same article:
Quote:
|
He wants to see if the building can be remediated, and if it can’t, he wants to see some sort of public space there.
|
and
Quote:
|
Farr has heard that the building is beyond repair, but he wants to confirm that.
|
In other words, see if it's salvageable and then make a decision based on
real information. Sounds like a pretty good idea to me.
I'm not a "Farr apologist" but he just scored a huge win for the downtown with the gore vote, and he has not taken an official position on this building yet -- it's a little premature to bash him over an unmade decision.