What Clark should be asking is: "Why are we not spending our cycling infrastructure budget when we know that improved bike infrastructure will lower future roads costs - our single biggest expenditure?"
In other words, what roadblocks are preventing the build-out of the cycling master plan?
And when a project such as the bridge replacement at king/kenilworth ($2.3 million) comes up, or the reconstruction of the claremont collapse (making it wder than the 403 again, for $???million), or the construction of an overpass at clappisons ($$hundreds of millions) where are the cries? This selective myopia is BAD fiscal governance dressed up as good.
__________________
no clever signoff.
|