View Single Post
  #720  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2013, 1:39 AM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by makr3trkr View Post
If you have an accident on a 4 lane bridge, one side stops instantly.
The reality of the situation is this: If you have an accident on a six-lane bridge then the best you can hope for is one clear lane to travel through on the side of the accident (and you don't always get that). If you think three rush-hour lanes lanes trying merging into one is going to be a walk in the park then you're sadly mistaken. The overall impact on people is going to end up being in the same ballpark once you account for the fact that more people will be regular users of the six-lane bridge compared to those who would have used a four-lane bridge.

Accidents happen and they cause traffic havoc, period - no matter how many lanes you have - unless you wildly overbuild beyond the capacity of the surrounding road network to supply traffic, which is a colossal waste of money IMHO.
Reply With Quote