View Single Post
  #2102  
Old Posted May 2, 2013, 11:08 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,710
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoneStarMike View Post
I'm just going by what's in the Statesman.



I'm interpreting that to mean Sutton sold the land they had to a completely different developer to pay for the land they bought and the land that was was sold to Dinerstein is much smaller because that's the kind of project Dinerstein does. I could be wrong, though.
No. Now that I read it again, it sounds right. My mistake.
Reply With Quote