[RyLucky]

The NCLRT line probably won't reduce service hours, but the routes will be redistributed to better serve new communities, as they will be for the WLRT. Essentially, better service will be provided for the same operational cost. Operational cost will never decrease so long as we grow, but costs per capita might gradually decrease. There is also a phenomenon where improving transit anywhere improves transit everywhere; and the more stations effectively connected to the system, the more each station is used. This is somebody's law... I forget who...

The real economic value is found in increased efficiency of the city. People spend less of their time (or less of their money) getting around, which allows more time with family, at work, or at leisure. Efficient roads and public transit allows us to better utilize land that other wise would have little economic value, and rapid transit is the most efficient way to move people. Higher land values, more city revenue, better health, more disposable income, stronger economy, Blah blah blah, etc. If you are reading this site, you are probably already converted and there is no point telling you about these benefits. Get out and vote for the party you think best supports an urban economy.

On another note, I think there is a case for maintaining a service track between 201 and 202, but 203 (SE/NC) is not worth connecting to 201 or 202.