The Spec made a good point that Chapman makes more than the 2 previous chiefs of staffs had. DiIanni's barely made over $100, 000 and Eisenberger's was not registered on the "over $100, 000" list. What exactly are we paying for here? What makes her so much more valuable than her last two counterparts? Why does she deserve a raise that is worth almost as much as I make in a year? At a time when the city is stressing fiscal responsibility, why is HR handing out the raises like it appears to be?
__________________
"Above all, Hamilton must learn to think like a city, not a suburban hybrid where residents drive everywhere. What makes Hamilton interesting is the fact it's a city. The sprawl that surrounds it, which can be found all over North America, is running out of time."
|