[markbarbera]

As others have said this is nothing new, certainly not for Hamilton politics. Removal of signs is part of the package and not worth getting upset about. Best reponse is the same as when property is vandalized: replace the missing signs and move on with the campaign.

As far as my reference to leaflets, it was merely an illustration on how cheap politics can get and not meant to lay blame on who was responsible for them. Regardless of whether the info in the leaflets can be found on the net, distribution of them is as cheap a political tactic as the removal of signs, particularly when the leaflet is unsigned. Even more so if the content is libellous as Morelli alleges.