Quote:
Originally Posted by The North One
NO! not another one bryant part!
and this thing is ten times more fat and fugly looking!
|
If this building were a few hundred feet shorter, I guess you could call it as fat as the BofA (btw, who says fat can't be beautiful! I like the BofA.)
But it's just right for its size, and would probably look "slimmer" overall than the tallest Manhattan West tower, though both are proposed at the same height.
Meanwhile, you can't find a better location, transitwise, for this tower.
Not even the WTC with its hubs (Fulton Center and PATH terminal) can beat it.
Below ground, here's a look at the Gimbel's Passageway that will reopen connecting the various rail lines...
