View Single Post
  #18  
Old Posted May 24, 2010, 11:14 PM
m0nkyman m0nkyman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by jemartin View Post
They need an option to simply add grass, trees and fields of play, a fountain, and a grass ampitheatre.

Keep all the buildings except the stands, retain the site revenue and return the site to a beautiful place.

My park includes all of it and keeping the Ex, the trade shows and the agricultural heritage.

And you certainly don't need to spend $33M to $80M for landscaping.

People make a park.
I've avoided getting into an argument with you about this because it is apparent that you have no wish to listen to the other side of a debate. Please don't quote me again unless you actually have a point to make either in disagreeing with a point or agreeing. Landscaping is more expensive than you think unless your goal is to replace the stadium with a barren and windswept field in the winter and an empty field of burnt and unwatered grass in the summer. That may be your goal. It is not mine.
Reply With Quote