View Single Post
  #991  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2009, 10:04 PM
cololi cololi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 690
Think about what makes Park City great. If it conjures up 6-10 story buildings creeping further up the mountainside and a "metropolitan" feel, then you have never been there and you have no respect for the history of the place. It is about respecting the place, the environment around it, the historical development pattern, etc. treasure Mt does none of that. There are few resort towns that are able to manage their growth in a way that preserves a places heart and soul and in the and preserve the very thing that makes people want to travel there. Think South lake tahoe vs north lake tahoe. Where would you rather be, in the south where they have had no regard for sight lines, height impacts, and incorporating development into nature, or north lake tahoe where at least some form of growth management consideration has taken place.

I think some form of this project is entirely appropriate. As presented no. The positives of this project is far too small to offset the negatives.
Reply With Quote