View Single Post
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2008, 8:28 AM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFView View Post
I saw 350 Mission listed as 385 feet tall in the Examiner.
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showpost.php?p=3823412&postcount=1912
One more time and then I give up. The DEVELOPER put in the brochure soliciting tenants--which presumably could be the basis of a lawsuit if it contains false or misleading information--that the building will be 375 ft. Now there is one basis to muddy that a bit: It says 27 ft plus mechanical penthouse. Then it says 375 ft. Does that include the mechanical penthouse? You decide. But the mechanical penthouse is likely to be more than 10 ft so that still wouldn't explain 385 ft. So I think the Examiner is just wrong--shocking thought, I realize.

OK, now. I give up.