Quote:
Originally Posted by cactus22minus1
Wha Wha whhaaa...
I'm not going to let it ruin the building for me, but I have to admit that I just lost my hardon.. temporarilly. Total sexy mesmerization from that angle.. all those curves. Such an obvious approximation blows the organic feel from this view. The inaccuracy is not the flacidator for me, really. It's much more about the straight segments.. the hard angles.
It's like analogue(sweet, sweet analogue) vs. digital. Sigh.
I will still worship the ground this building rests on because of all the other amazing things they did so very right. But this is not a budget residence and I don't really understand why you would try to get away with such an obvious marr on the most beautiful and noticeable part of the building. 
Oh, and thanks Jibba and Hydrogen for those exquisite shots. So uhh.. Hydrogen, I know that old worthless gear is just collecting dust on that shelf right about now. Why not let cactus take that off your hands? 
|
Cactus, I have no idea why you got flaccid over that picture, (I missed the "approximation" you spoke of) but I expect if I only focused on Angelina Jolie's elbow, I might get a bit of whiskey dick myself. Man, wait until it's finished to throb because if this building is half as good as it's renderings, it will leave many people wet (get it? "Aqua"-"wet"!).