View Single Post
  #285  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 7:31 PM
arbeiter's Avatar
arbeiter arbeiter is offline
passion for patterns
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 10,336
Quote:
Originally Posted by M1EK View Post
The fact that nobody builds higher in this part of town than that, I suppose. And I'm very familiar with them - rode my bike up Balcones hundreds of times on the way to several offices; and took my wife in for a couple appointments in the newest buildings.

They're accessible from Mopac - the newest ones are, anyways, and yes, the frontage road becomes Balcones at North Hills - but to the suburban driver that's no real difference; it's the frontage road unless they have to make an extra turn. (I'd ride my bike northbound up Balcones from Hancock to North Hills and then hang a left).

Agreed that the parcel behind Randall's is less accessible. I was just making the case that the reason it was profitable to develop the new stuff at relatively low-density farther north but not profitable to redevelop the old stuff at the same density further south is that the property further north can generate a lot more dollars per square foot due to better visibility and better automobile access from Mopac.
Well, who knows, the demand for office space isn't exactly on fire, so time will tell. I bet they still get redeveloped within 5-7 years. At the very least, that Randall's will be redeveloped, there's no way those affluent Cat Mountain people can tolerate that! I hope they don't just shut it down and build a new supermarket at 2222 and 360.
__________________
you should know that I'm womanly wise
my website/blog. or, my flickr site.
Reply With Quote