Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketman_95046
Already done,,, the approved rincon hill & transbay plans include new parks allong with the "greedy developments"  |
Not sure that this very small plot of land with a couple restaurants along a waterfront is that bad of a problem. I walk through the area all the time and this doesn't seem that intrusive or out of place.
That aerial photo reminds me, though: what we really need to talk about is what to do with Piers 30-32. Since it looks like the proposed Cruise Ship terminal is bound for Pier 27 (which is a more ideal location for tourists) what can be done with 30-32? To leave it as a barren asphault occasional outdoor party spot a few times a year seems like a waste to me. Could it not be improved into some kind of better public recreational facility?