Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CrimsonW
And in Washington, under my proposal, garfield county would only have representation equal to King County in one chamber as well. The other chamber would still be controlled by the same people.
And of course you don't want the same system applied to Washington...the power of King County would be greatly diminished under such a system....which is of course why I want the change.
|
I figured but I still like our legislature just the way it is.
King County: 30% of the population, 30% of the legislators. Sounds fair to me.
Like we already discussed, rural areas already get lots of extra money from the state anyway. They don't need an unfair advantage in the legislature, too.
Besides, I doubt Spokane would benefit much from a system like you're proposing. Or maybe you just want more Republicans.
