Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00
They literally published a study corridor. And opponents have been mapping their survey requests which makes it clear they do have a route. They've been making city councils sign NDAs, not to disclose said route. You not knowing about the route doesn't mean they don't have one. Is the political interference troubling? Absolutely. Doesn't mean they don't have a route.
As for regulatory change. There's already one piece of legislation in the works. And there's plenty of time for more.
But let's be honest here. You're seeing what you want to see, which is failure. Not surprising for someone that has not seen value in the idea ever. At this point, is there any infrastructure you actually support building? Serious question. Cause I've only seen you bitch and moan about everything.
|
I think you are so desperate for this project to occur in a certain timeframe that you’re disregarding obvious signs the government is not nearly as serious about that timeframe as you are, or not willing to take the steps to get it in your preferred timeline.
A study corridor is not a route. A study corridor is what you do when you’re trying to find a route. The surveys, etc are not in a line, they are in a general area. Whether it is political interference or not the Ontario segment has been significantly rerouted in the last few weeks, which means they need another study corridor to look for another route.
“One piece of legislation in the works” is extremely vague and could mean just about anything.