Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiND
|
Not really. A lone councilmember doesn't have the power to block approval. The city council as a whole does have a say in the ULURP process. But if the city and state wants this done, it will be done. As it is, that's just one hoop, and the casino proposals already survived an earlier ULURP process. Even surviving ULURP (which is what the state is blaming the delay in licensing until next year on), there is still the matter of the 6 member board that has to approval a casino proposal before it even gets to the final round. Any proposal cand only afford to lose 2 votes, of which 1 will represent the city council member. Still a long way to go.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan
To please the NIMBYs. More towers = lower heights per tower. Unless they're skinnier.
|
That could also equal less open space and more daylight blocking towers. See how that works?