View Single Post
  #12  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2024, 11:28 PM
jbermingham123's Avatar
jbermingham123 jbermingham123 is offline
Registered (Nimby Ab)User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Diego > Great Falls, MT > Denver > St. Louis > Providence, RI > Worcester, MA > Kunming, China > Bay Area > St. Louis > Seattle
Posts: 784
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
If these maps are actually to the same scale, and if the data is accurate, Chicago blows everyone else away (sans NYC), Southside gaps included. The scale of the Northside/inner burbs would be on another level.

But I don't trust the scales here.
I dont trust the scales either. Philly seems quite zoomed out, Boston zoomed in.

Philly proper is almost entirely covered by green and blue, which extends out into its suburbs. Very little pink, except in industrial areas.

Chicago proper extends below the bottom of the map here, with lots of pink pockets in the south side.



It would be cool to somehow cross-referennce these maps with population density, to get a sense of *how many* people live in blue/green areas vs pink, and then rank order the cities by % of population in walkable areas. In this case, Chicago would easily be #2
__________________
You guys are laughing now but Jacksonville will soon assume its rightful place as the largest and most important city on Earth.

I heard the UN is moving its HQ there. The eiffel tower is moving there soon as well. Elon Musk even decided he didnt want to go to mars anymore after visiting.
Reply With Quote