Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere
This is a good example I think of why I think Cameron is a net improvement over his predecessor - he sometimes oversteps on issues but as a whole is likely going to be good for the City as a councilor.. Hamilton has huge issues with maintenance of the public realm which I honestly think is a big reason it has such a "rough" reputation visually.. It's not just the cracked asphalt, it's the day to day maintenance of public streets as well. The city is way behind other municipalities on litter collection, weed control, etc. One of the best examples is the maintenence of the downtown rail underpasses - which is hilariously poor. Good to see that changing, especially since so many visitors experience it as a result of the proximity to the GO Station.
|
Totally agree. He's made a lot of missteps in his time as councilor and I haven't agreed with everything he has done or said but Farr was just a joke of a politician by comparison. Also agree that this is much needed, the TH&B underpasses are digusting. Its really embarassing how passengers leaving and entering the GO station at James and John have to walk under that pigeon shit infested, dark mess.