SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Manitoba & Saskatchewan (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=129)
-   -   Winnipeg | 51 Roslyn Rd. | 6F (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=246905)

Wpg_Guy May 18, 2021 11:54 PM

Winnipeg | 51 Roslyn Rd. | 6F
 
51 Roslyn Rd
Location: 51 Roslyn Rd, Winnipeg, MB
Developer:
Architects: h5 Architecture
Contractor:
Status: Pre application
Media:
Description: 15 Storey 80 unit residential tower located in Osborne Village. Construction anticipated spring/fall 2022


https://i.imgur.com/DOD9wP6.jpg?1

https://i.imgur.com/9x60E8b.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/8CtiD8r.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/5IqBBNK.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/Eqg7jGu.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/Aco9Qs7.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/eVRjzgs.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/j8DGUYl.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/By6fAit.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/mCUy2q0.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/cmMqSj0.jpg

peg May 19, 2021 2:19 AM

It definitely checks the boxes! Though I would like to get a closer look at the tower facade. I love how thin the proposed tower is. It would look great from the Legislature side of the river :)

esquire May 19, 2021 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by peg (Post 9284703)
It would look great from the Legislature side of the river :)

It would look good from both the Roslyn side and the river/Legislature side... right now when you stand on the north bank of the river, the view directly across to the south probably hasn't changed since the 70s. It would be nice to see something fresh in that direction.

This proposal looks like it designed to a pretty high standard with what looks like a nice masonry exterior... I'm looking forward to seeing it get built.

EndoftheBeginning May 19, 2021 1:17 PM

Hard to tell, but the curb cut on Roslyn looks like an entrance to underground parking rather than a pass-through to the north side of the lot and surface parking abutting the river. Most of the other properties on the north side of Roslyn do have surface parking at the back (except 21 Roslyn). If there is no paved lot at the back, they have an opportunity to make a really nice riverfront space for residents (after removing the existing parking pad used by Saigon).

Lived in 21 Roslyn a long time ago and they experienced periodic flooding in the lower level (had to move the car more than once), so you have to be careful with underground so close to the river (not that it can't be done, there are lots of them along Wellington Crescent).

biguc May 19, 2021 1:22 PM

Looks like a parking podium.

It's kind of a shame. I always loved The Saigon.

EndoftheBeginning May 19, 2021 1:31 PM

Makes more sense, looks like a two level podium behind the south facade.

Wpg_Guy May 19, 2021 1:32 PM

The podium is indeed a Parkade.

zalf May 19, 2021 4:14 PM

In the Design Summary's description of the units, I imagine micro-unit == a bachelor suite, but what is a live-work unit in this context?

I know the term can apply when a small shop has an apartment upstairs, but does that apply in a tower?

trueviking May 19, 2021 4:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by biguc (Post 9284997)
Looks like a parking podium.

It's kind of a shame. I always loved The Saigon.

me too.

Wpg_Guy May 19, 2021 4:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zalf (Post 9285224)
In the Design Summary's description of the units, I imagine micro-unit == a bachelor suite, but what is a live-work unit in this context?

I know the term can apply when a small shop has an apartment upstairs, but does that apply in a tower?

The live work units are on the top level, they are double storey units with (larger) office space.

sleepyeyed May 19, 2021 4:35 PM

0.9 stalls per unit.. also, I wonder if we'll ever see the city take back some of the riverfront land for parks/paths. the parking lot built to the river edge next door is especially bad.

trueviking May 19, 2021 4:36 PM

that's quite the cantilever! I feel like there might be a couple columns in the end.

Brule-le May 19, 2021 4:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyeyed (Post 9285262)
0.9 stalls per unit.. also, I wonder if we'll ever see the city take back some of the riverfront land for parks/paths. the parking lot built to the river edge next door is especially bad.

All of the parking appears to be within the podium. The old surface parking lot is gone, covered by outdoor amenities and the footprint of the new building. :tup:

Wpg_Guy May 13, 2022 10:11 PM

Redesign
 
Quote:

As a result of community feedback gathered at two virtual public open houses, the original 15-storey, 80-unit proposal for this site has been significantly refined to 6 storeys and 66 units. The building and landscape design has been developed with careful attention to the principles outlined in the Osborne Village Neighbourhood Plan, and celebrates the lively, pedestrian-oriented nature of Osborne Village.

The building will offer a variety of rental suites ranging in size from studio to two-bedroom apartments, as well as interior and exterior amenity space that includes a rooftop patio. The reshaped footprint respects neighbours’ access to views and daylight with increased side yard clearances. A 51-stall parking area will be concealed within the volume of the building and will feature ten percent designated visitor parking, as well as a Peg City Car Coop space. The building will also address its prominent river-front position by providing public green space at the rear of the site, allowing pedestrians and residents alike to enjoy the views of the Assiniboine River and Manitoba Legislature beyond.

It is our hope that this revised proposal, which employs a rich material language and emphasis towards the river’s edge, will set a positive precedent for future riverfront development.

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...aa637c52_c.jpghttps://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...893d3f84_c.jpghttps://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...62a4a19d_c.jpghttps://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...afb706eb_c.jpg

trueviking May 13, 2022 10:53 PM

Sad trombone.

WinCitySparky May 14, 2022 12:00 AM

Wow what a waste

Kris22 May 14, 2022 2:44 AM

Not sure why 15 floors was a problem considering the river is lined with towers that size all over the city. Not to mention the evergreen towers are a stone's throw away.

The new design has a pretty awful facade facing the street. It very clearly looks like the side of a building, not "lively and pedestrian oriented" like it says in the article.

The positive is that there's no surface parking lot right next to the river like so many neighbouring buildings, which is something that always seemed like such a waste of a prime location and view.

trueviking May 14, 2022 2:49 AM

I’m going to guess that this was a significant cost savings wrapped in a gesture to public consultation. They probably had a 15 storey building priced and realized that they could build only 14 fewer units for half the price by not going high rise.

Definitely a qualitative change to have riverfront property and face almost every unit towards the adjacent buildings.

pegcityboy May 14, 2022 4:41 AM

Terrible revision , every balcony at 6 floors faces next building wall , no views of anything now , may as well keep Miss Saigon !! Very disappointing! No reason why river property can’t be higher , many many examples of mid rise to high rises along the river !

GreyGarden May 14, 2022 4:43 PM

This city... The revision looks cheap and is a significant step down in aesthetic design and in the way it meets the street. lol sad trombone is the perfect description.


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.