![]() |
178-200 Isabella St | 62m | 19f | Proposed
Big proposal for the empty lot on Isabella:
https://i.imgur.com/gCSQlNch.jpg https://i.imgur.com/JMvHw1Bh.jpg http://ottwatch.ca/devapps/D02-02-20-0086 |
Very bulky, but decent design.
EDIT: the cladding will make or break the final product. |
I like the green colour on the inner balcony walls
|
178-200 Isabella St | 57m | 16f | Proposed
Minto is proposing the development of a 16-storey, “I-Rise” mixed-use building with mezzanine and enclosed rooftop amenity area featuring commercial uses at-grade and residential uses above, at 178, 180, 182 and 200 Isabella Street The building is oriented parallel to Isabella Street, enclosing the public street edge, and animating the sidewalk through highly transparent ground floor. A single commercial space wraps the northwest corner of the ground floor frontage along Isabella, relating to the existing commercial tenancies along Bank Street. In total, 366 square metres of commercial space is provided. The residential lobby and main entrance are in the northeast corner of the ground floor with direct access from the public sidewalk. The ground floor features a height of 6.5 metres, allowing for interior loading and servicing space. At the rear of the building on the ground floor are townhouse units with second floor mezzanines and private patios fronting onto the rear yard. The east facade of the ground floor integrates the functional building services while the parking garage access is located in the rear yard and is covered with a green roof.
The upper storeys of the building include 251 total residential units, including a mix of 1 bedroom, 2 bedroom, and 2 bedroom + den units. The ground floor has a smaller footprint, allowing the upper storeys to cantilever over top of the vehicular access on the east side, and over a small plaza/commercial patio space on the west side of the building. Vehicular access is provided via two-way driveway access point on the east side of the site from Isabella Street. Four (4) surface parking spaces at-grade will provide convenience parking for the commercial area, while also providing a space for drop-offs and deliveries for residents. Vehicles accessing the underground parking garage would pass under the upper floors of the building before entering the garage via the covered ramp located in the rear yard. A four (4) storey underground parking garage occupies the full area of the subject property. A total of 172 vehicular parking spaces are provided within the garage, in addition to the four (4) spaces provided at-grade. A total of 131 bicycle parking spaces are provided on levels P1 and P2 of the parking garage. This includes horizontal stacked bike parking spaces on level P1 and vertical spaces on level P2. The proposed development seeks to bury the existing hydro lines running along the Isabella Street frontage and proposes street trees along the length of the frontage at the curb line. Additional trees are proposed along the frontage within the subject property using soil cells below grade to ensure adequate soil volumes. The properties are currently vacant, though they were previously occupied by a five (5) storey office building known as the “Queensway Towers”. The building was demolished approximately 5 years ago and filled the entire depth of the property at 200 Isabella Street. At 178, 180, and 182, the lands were previously used for a one (1) storey office building and surface parking areas, with the building being demolished approximately 7 years ago. Architect: Quadrangle Architects Development application: https://app01.ottawa.ca/postingplans...appId=__B011JX Location: https://i.imgur.com/WEEdqmD.png Siteplan: https://i.imgur.com/lnHJWnk.png Renderings: https://i.imgur.com/S8G0aTx.png https://i.imgur.com/uC3TVCd.png https://i.imgur.com/b1oX1gx.png https://i.imgur.com/HHPlpCI.png https://i.imgur.com/45myzbx.png https://i.imgur.com/d8A9fQV.png https://i.imgur.com/SMGLJFr.png |
Everything about this makes sense.. architecture, height, location.. 9/10 make it happen!
|
Quote:
|
If it makes all those people want to job on Isabella St., it will be well worth it!
FWIW, there is another 16 storey proposal for Chamberlain on the west side of Bank, just west of the Credit Union. |
I mean it's ok. I guess. Hard to have very high expectations for what is effectively a ramp onto the Queensway. But still, I don't get why we allow so many of these proposals that front onto only one street like this. Is it too much to ask to start demanding more developments front onto at least two streets?
|
Quote:
|
It's kind of...dreadful.
|
I don't mind it. Doesn't look bad in my opinion, but it looks like they had room for two taller towers instead of a big slab.
|
Minto has been doing really great stuff in the Glebe and in New Edinburgh as of late.
I like the scale of the proposal, but I wish they would have pushed the envelope on the design a little, perhaps with community consultation the design will evolve for the better. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.shawnmenard.ca/chamberlain_avenue |
I trust Minto implicitly at this point. The design is as good as a major highway corridor deserves and there is no way they will cheap out on the materials.
It will be interesting to watch the Glebe Retired-Lawyer NIMBY crew during the virtual consultations. Might be the most violent thing I watch in the next year. |
With development along Preston, Bank, and the Metcalfe interchange we will start to have a mini-Gardiner feel along the central Queensway
|
Quote:
These half developments end up stymying future development around them, particularly when they're as massive as this one. Don't get me wrong, some development is better than no development. But by extension, more development is better than some development. |
FWIW, this, as you're all saying, is a highway and highway ramp frontage. Build as big a wall as possible on every lot fronting the highway. It will drive up property values on the next street over, and make life MUCH more pleasant for all.
The condo next to the police union on Catherine seems to have done well, and it's exactly the same idea. My only gripe is the 1970's balconies of the upper tower. Although, maybe continuous balcony slabs will make a comeback? It's reminiscent of the Business Inn over on Elgin. Also, there's not too many NIMBY's to complain about shadows and traffic. Frankly, this building should be two or three times bigger! https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pr...B-eO4ujgaXayR8 |
Quote:
Quote:
https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/c...g?format=1000w https://www.mattrichling.com/the-bow...ondos-for-sale |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 1:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.