Mayfair West (Oakridge Transit Centre Redevelopment) | Proposed
 

http://images.dailyhive.com/20161220...t-centre-3.jpg

http://images.dailyhive.com/20161220...t-centre-2.jpg

http://images.dailyhive.com/20161220...t-centre-3.jpg

http://images.dailyhive.com/20161220...it-cente-1.jpg

http://dailyhive.com/vancouver/trans...it-centre-sold

Does the buyer of the bus depot also own the strip that fronts Oak St already?

When will vancouver realize that there are enough parks. Vancouver is one of the most 'green/park' cities in the world, and we still need to build new ones? Burnaby is one giant park already. Deer Lake, Burnaby Lake, Central Park, Byrnn Creek Central Park etc. and the same goes for Vancouver (graveyards also count as park space if you ask me). I know there is a law that saws that there's a ratio for park to dwellings, but the city should just scrap it. It must make prices jump up as developers have to contribute (waste precious land) to build what there is enough of. Like Montgomery and Oak Meadow Parks are literally 2 blocks away if that's too far away for you to walk you don't deserve to go outside. Not to mention Van Dusen and Queen Elizabeth are right there too.
I'm thankful that we live in a city that isn't like Los Angeles or New York (they have beautiful parks but not enough for 9 million) with park space but for now were good.

Always interesting to see what ruffles the feathers.

The problem isn't so much the park as what they're doing with it... more grass, more trees. How creative. Perhaps a large pond instead?

Regardless, I like what they did with the street/building contours. Very relaxing to look at.

Given that combined with RCMP lands there's a huge opportunity to do something amazing with redevelopment. However given the the way a similar opportunity on the Cambie corridor has been botched with a parade of dreck, I'm not hopeful.

100% agreed. Vancouver's park obsession shows no signs of abating - we're losing a huge chunk of a site on two rapid transit corridors to yet another park, despite immediate proximity to Oak Meadows Park and Van Deusen Gardens.

Also it should be pointed out that the 1200 units is what can be achieved with two average Toronto condo towers. The central planners have failed everyone again.

I'd like to see an Upper West/East Side approach to density in this city.
http://images29.blocksy.com/L_931246.../original.jpeg
What characteristics make this style of urban planning really unique is
-The shared heights
-Shared Walls
-Box shaped instead of several different rectangles stacked on top of each other
-Building, Sidewalk, Curb, Road instead of several 'green bandaids' in between the building and the road
-Impecable architecture

Agreed. Green space for green space often turns out blaaaah (and Toronto-ish; no offense T.O.)- although I do like Vancouver's greenness.
But fountains and exotic plantings are too infrequent in this city, and I think Vancouver could use more creativity in its green space; not just blaah open space.
*For example, despite their cold winters, Kansas City is the 'city of fountains," with more city fountains than anywhere except Rome! Couldn't Vancouver take inspiration from there?

Anyone ever been in the Il Giardino park near Renfew/Hastings? I was surprised to see how well they finished it.

Never thought I'd see the day that parks of all things were now a negative feature in a comprehensive mixed development like this...

I support more parks. Overall I like the looks of this project for the area.

To clarify, the complaining isn't about parks - only GELs (Generic Empty Lawns) pretending to be parks. A plaza or large water feature would work much better.

As someone born in a well planned non overpopulated central European city with ample park space, who also lived in Sao Paulo, a overpopulated unplanned city with virtually no park space.

You can never ever have too much park space. Once its gone its gone. Build up if you want. Never sacrifice public open space. Ever.

And don't get me wrong unplanned overpopulated cities with no park space are fun to visit because their chaotic shit holes and interesting. But their not fun to live in.

^Agree completely.

^thirded.

Greenspace is literally one of the big things Vancouver is known for and it does make the neighborhoods a lot less suburban or midtown low-rises for block upon block.

Plus as mentioned with property vales inflated as they are once you deallocate a greenspace you will NEVER find neighbors willing to convert it back.

Depends on one's definition of "green space."

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...-_20140809.jpg

This is a green space.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...e2e460541e.jpg

This is also a green space.

http://landarchs.com/wp-content/uplo...10/Header4.jpg

And this.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...18df506f60.jpg


---------


It's entirely possible to have a park that's natural and urban, rather than one or the other. Simply putting up a grass field and manicured trees (the lazy way out) achieves neither, and makes the area look MORE suburban, not less - hence the suggestion of a plaza/pond/fountain centred or adjacent to said field.

I'm in favor of more green space, I think this park is fine.

Although if there are big spaces with grass, I'd love to see more things to encourage active play and exercise, like soccer nets, frisbee golf, whatever.

...and that is the crux of the problem - but has anyone here contacted the CoV about it?

If you want the context of "greenspace"

http://www.vancitybuzz.com/wp-conten...lling-Park.png

http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/75581693.jpg

Basic template for parks on the east end. Few trees, grass for multi-purpose recreation space and possibly basic services like a utility shed or public bathroom or possibly soccer goalposts.
Minimal maintenance costs, doesn't require a genius to design something spectacular and accessible to anyone.