![]() |
Ottawa's Byward Market
Has the City gone too far in 'regulating' the Byward Market? According to Ron Corbett of the Ottawa Sun it has.
http://www.ottawasun.com/news/columnists/ron_corbett/2009/09/06/10773991.html Is The Market as we know it doomed? |
I find the market has improved this year. Specifically the vegetable vendors.
|
Quote:
|
If someone ever did that to me, they would be suprised when I turned around a gave them a quick and hard punch in the face. Might I suggest you try saying excuse me in lieu of assualting people and potentially being assulted yourself.
Agree that they should close some roads in the market. I know there was talk about it last summer, but that seemed to have passed quickly. Closing the roads perm. would allow the vendors to move in and allow the local businesses to have their store fronts back. Also those in the Byward Market building could have small patios. Would improve the market big time imo. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Yes, because fixing the Byward Market is critical, as it is a failure and needs to be fixed as soon as possible. Let's use Sparks St as our model, and close some streets to mimic it's success. :rolleyes:
|
Certainly you cannot seriously think the ByWard Market's success is due to the fact that these two streets are open to traffic or that the failure of Sparks is due to the fact that they closed the road.
|
[QUOTE=Zach6668;4446706]You forgot to mention that both of them were pushing those double-wide baby strollers. At least that's my experience. :D
QUOTE] You must have been walking right behind me that day! I edited out a mention of the strollers because I didn't want to seem anti-child :sly: What's up with strollers nowadays - am I shrinking in my old age or have they gotten honking big? I saw a woman at Bridgehead the other day struggling to get through the doorway with one the size of a small mobile home. Since the kid doesn't give a s--t what he's being wheeled around in I assume that they're designed to satisfy some obscure urge of the parent. |
Quote:
|
It my opinion Sparks fails because it became a buisness district (does well during lunch Mon-Fri). The market flourishes because there are many condos and other housing nearby.
It's like NCC tried to build the Market on Sparks St, but it did not happen as it was already happening naturally in the ByWard Market area. Housing developers had to compete against huge businesses on Sparks for property but did not have to do that in the Market. |
Personally, I think the failure of Sparks Street is due to the fact that in the 70s Wellington street was cut in half and then unnaturally spliced on to the Ottawa River Parkway, and then the LeBreton area was bulldozed. This upset the main pattern of commercial east-west traffic that used to naturally flow between Centretown and Hintonburg, and moved it farther south. The hole in the urban fabric at LeBreton essentially made western downtown into a dead end and has been stagnating since. The same can be said about the eastern end of Hintonburg.
I doubt banning traffic on some streets in the ByWard Market would harm it. The two streets one either side of the market building, especially. If and/or when transit is finally streamlined downtown and there is no longer much need for the Rideau Street bus mall, vehicular traffic should be concentrated there and there would be no real reason for George or York streets to be full through roads. |
I agree with you about Byward Market. The idea of at least partly closing William and Byward between George and Clarence appeals to me. I'd also take a hard look at York between Sussex and William and Clarence from Sussex to Dalhousie. There would still have to be some vehicular access for residents and deliveries, and maybe a couple of gaps for parking garage access but overall the creation of a pedestrian zone would seem a terrific thing. I will admit I don't know what that might do to car traffic (Dalhousie is already brutal much of the time), but it doesn't seem to raise insurmountable difficulties. I am not sure why it would have any negative effect on business in the area.
|
Just saw this thread and thought I'd post a reply...
Closing traffic on ByWard and William Streets beside the Market Building seems appealing for tourists and area residents, but is not practical in so far as it would severely harm a large part of what makes the ByWard Market work. Consider the following:
That being said, the City is planning on closing the north corner of William Street at York Street, and rerouting the traffic from the parking garage north to Clarence Street. This will create a newly landscaped area for special events, performances and new vendors, and limit some of the traffic in the core of the Market. |
Quote:
|
Closing a street to regular traffic does not mean supply trucks cannot enter. Practically all European open-air markets are in pedestrian only zones and function just fine. Also, the goal should not be necessarily making the streets pedestrian-only, but making them pedestrian-priority.
What is ridiculous in the ByWard Market is that we seem to value surface parking more than pedestrian space. The area dedicated to car parking far outweighs the pedestrian space. Trying to find a decent place to sit outside after you've bought a Beavertail or ice cream can be difficult. What the streets around the Market building need to become is more like a shared space or a"woonerf", where by taking away the divisions between road and sidewalk allow the use of the street to become more flexible depending on season or time of day. |
Quote:
As much as I like the term woonerf, which is a new one to me, it sounds like they depend on curves as traffic calming measures. A great idea, but difficult to implement in the very grid oriented market. I particularly like the following quote in your reference: "The use of curves eliminates lengthy sightlines for drivers. "Don't let [the driver] search for the end of his torment," a Dutch woonerf expert suggests only half-jokingly." |
There is nothing that says the city cannot close a street to traffic and still allow access to delivery vehicles. They can also further limit access to these delivery vehicles to off peak hours.
I live in Vanier and use the market on a regular basis. I have never once been able to park on either street even with the 15 min zones. Making these streets more pedestrian friendly does not mean you need to remove cyclists. In fact it would make the route more bicycle friendly which it currently is not. For that matter, it is not very car friendly atm either. This not to mention, those who operate businesses on these streets have little space for patios in the summer or for proper store fronts and signage that can be seen. I loathe sitting in Must Tapas looking at the white van that is parked 6-8 feet away every day (it is one of the vendors vehicles). I would be upset as an owner who pays proper property tax being shut out of view by vendors who don't. |
Quote:
|
report by Project for Public Spaces
http://ottawa.ca/sites/ottawa.ca/files/attachments/ottpage/byward_market_en.pdf Citizen summary http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/ottawa...arking+advises+report/8228399/story.html sometimes I wonder how much of the traffic in the market is people circling around looking for a free spot until they give up and go into a garage |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 9:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.