SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Atlantic Provinces (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=32)
-   -   [Moncton] Centre Avenir Centre | 26.65m |~6 Fl | Completed (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=203545)

Monctoncore Jan 16, 2013 4:49 PM

[Moncton] Centre Avenir Centre | 26.65m |~6 Fl | Completed
 
After going through the threads I feel its time we have a thread dedicated to the Events Centre, especially since we are going to seeing more plans and more happening in the next year on this project.

NADEAU SOUCI ELLIS

http://i1321.photobucket.com/albums/...ps3f0731a5.jpg

EXP. ARCHITECTS INC.

http://i1321.photobucket.com/albums/...ps8bcd055b.jpg

ARCHITECTS 4

http://i1321.photobucket.com/albums/...ps157a58d4.jpg


ARCHITECTURE 2000

http://i1321.photobucket.com/albums/...psa4461204.jpg

http://i1321.photobucket.com/albums/...ps224c4c71.jpg



The location chosen for the proposal

http://i1321.photobucket.com/albums/...ps95202820.jpg



All the images are taken out of the Moncton Downtown thread and all photos from the Moncton City Website.

MonctonRad Jan 16, 2013 4:55 PM

You may be right, but this is still nothing more than a proposal at the present time, so if you don't mind, i might request one of our new mods (ahem Myles, Greg) to change the title of the thread to something like:

[Moncton] Downtown Events Centre (proposal) :)

While you're at it guys, for the sake of maintaining naming conventions, perhaps you could change the Moncton Ideas thread to:

[Moncton] Ideas

Here's the URL for the webcam at the events centre construction site. Enjoy. :)

http://www.moncton.ca/Visitors/Web_C...own_Centre.htm

Monctoncore Jan 16, 2013 4:56 PM

Agreed

SignalHillHiker Jan 16, 2013 6:28 PM

Ahhh! :D Specific project threads for Moncton, I love it!

Is this the incredible shrinking event centre you joked about, MonctonRad?

MonctonCore, you should dig up whatever information has been posted in other threads and consolidate it here. And get a picture (even just a Google Street View capture) of what the site looks like today.

Here's the thread for ours, just to show you what I mean. And if you have any ideas how we can make ours better, easier to read, whatever, please don't hesitate to comment there.

Taeolas Jan 16, 2013 7:03 PM

That is the ever shrinking Event Centre. At this rate, it'll be built sometime in 2120, and it will consist of an unpaved parking lot and a park bench in the middle of it. :)

Until then though, there was a lot of discussion about it in the Inside Wheeler thread, including the proposals that were made for it.

JHikka Jan 16, 2013 7:04 PM

As far as i'm concerned if it holds any less than a capacity of 10,000 it's a letdown.

MonctonRad Jan 16, 2013 7:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SignalHillHiker (Post 5975759)
Ahhh! :D Specific project threads for Moncton, I love it!

Is this the incredible shrinking event centre you joked about, MonctonRad?

MonctonCore, you should dig up whatever information has been posted in other threads and consolidate it here. And get a picture (even just a Google Street View capture) of what the site looks like today.

Yes, this is indeed the Incredible Shrinking Events Centre :haha:

Probably about 40% of the posts in the [Moncton] Centre (inside Wheeler) thread are about the events centre, so I don't think it is practical to move them all here, but I agree that some of the more important posts should be moved. I will do that tonight or within the next couple of days.

BTW, with this new thread, I am worried about some confusion with the name of the existing [Moncton] Centre thread. I am therefore proposing the following change:

That the [Moncton] Centre (inside Wheeler) Developments thread be renamed to the [Moncton] Downtown (inside Wheeler) Developments thread.

I have already PM'ed Myles about this. Greg handled the other change quite expeditiously....

It's so great having local moderators!

:banana::banana::banana:

JHikka Jan 16, 2013 7:40 PM

Removed the (Inside Wheeler) portion of the thread title. I think we all know where Downtown Moncton is. :tup:

mylesmalley Jan 16, 2013 7:55 PM

My bad haha. Form autocomplete gets a bit ambitious sometimes!

MonctonRad Jan 16, 2013 8:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JHikka (Post 5975898)
Removed the (Inside Wheeler) portion of the thread title. I think we all know where Downtown Moncton is. :tup:

When I created the thread, I was trying to divide up Moncton into neighbourhoods so that we could have neighbourhood focussed discussions, I thought we needed some idea as to where the dividing line between "downtown" and the "northwest end" and "Moncton east" was. I arbitrarily used Wheeler Blvd as the dividing line.

I thought a definition was necessary because some people would have a very narrow view of where "downtown" Moncton is. For example, some would claim that downtown is bounded by Vaughan Harvey, Mountain Rd and King St. North of this you would have "north central Moncton" and west of this you would have the "west end". I just didn't want to get too neighbourhood specific.

Still, the original title of the thread was pretty cumbersome, and as long as everyone maintains the understanding that "downtown" means "within the confines of Wheeler Blvd", then I am cool with changing the name of the thread to [Moncton] Downtown Developments :tup:

MonctonRad Jan 17, 2013 3:24 AM

OK - I will select a few posts from the Moncton Downtown thread dealing with the events centre proposal.

#1 - regarding my impressions from attending the intial presentation at Moncton City Hall chambers nearly a year ago:

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonctonRad (Post 5664409)
OK - in a nutshell this is what happened.........

Moncton City Council invited four local architectural firms to submit renderings as to what they think the proposed events centre and ancillary developments could look like. There is no guarantee that any of these renderings will reflect what the final project will look like, or even that the events centre will definitely be approved in the first place.

This presentation therefore was made to fire the imagination of those in attendance, and to garner further public support for this project.

The presentation was made in a packed city council chambers. It was standing room only will people spilling out into the lobby outside. The energy in the room was very positive and the atmosphere was charged with excitement. The mayor and a number of city councillors were in attendance as well as Robert Goguen, the federal MP for Moncton.

Personal observations:

- All four presentations referred to the project as the Moncton Centre. I presume that this is the official "placeholder" name for the project until something better comes along.
- All four presentations were good, but I agree with mattyy that two in particular stood out. These were the ones by Architects Four and Architecture 2000. These were the most professional and included CGI flyby animations, but aside from this, they had the most impressive features.
- All four proposals would site the arena where the current Highfield Square is located, with a mixed use development being built on the current parking lot which includes retail, commercial and residential components.
- In all cases, Highfield Street would be extended south to lie between the arena and the mixed use development. In one case, vehicle access would be limited. In another case, Weldon would also be extended south and a roadway would be created encircling the arena.
- In two cases, the proposals included an extension of the project to also include lands on the south side of the railway tracks (as suggested on our forum :)), with one of these proposals including mixed use and parking south of the rail lines while the other proposal included an innovative integrated transit facility for Codiac Transo, VIA Rail and possibly Acadian Lines. This would be accomplished by relocating the VIA station to the new transit hub.
- The Architects Four proposal for the arena had the arena oriented along Main St with a strong streetfront presence with retail and restaurants lining the facade. The Architecture 2000 proposal had the arena obliquely oriented, parallelling the rail line rather than Main St. This allowed for a plaza in front of the arena facing Main St. This proposal also envisaged restaurants and pubs lining the streetfront, but the plaza in front allowed for patios in front of the restaurants.
- all four proposals included public spaces but these were in completely different locations depending on the proposal. The concept of an integrated convention facility was brought up a couple of times. One proposal included an art gallery.
- None of the proposals indicated any linkage to the Aquillini block across the street, but this could easily be addressed.

In essence, this is a transformative project that will completely resculpt two or possibly three city blocks (four if you include Aquillini). The downtown will most definitely never be the same if this project moves forward......

It was actually quite emotional watching these presentations in the council chamber. I don't think I was the only person who felt this way. :yes:


MonctonRad Jan 17, 2013 3:27 AM

#2 - pierremoncton posted this, including a link to a city hall website with numerous architectural renderings for review:


Quote:

Originally Posted by pierremoncton (Post 5664934)
The city has posted 56 renderings here: http://www.moncton.ca/Moncton__Our_T...Renderings.htm

A couple of interesting ones:

Density:
http://www.moncton.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?vid=12115

Lunar base:
http://www.moncton.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?vid=12140

Source: posted link


MonctonRad Jan 17, 2013 3:30 AM

#3 - mctnguy provided this link to a youtube video of the presentation (very informative, a must see really):


Quote:

Originally Posted by mctnguy (Post 5665814)
Here's a video of the presentation:

Video Link


MonctonRad Jan 17, 2013 3:34 AM

#4 - further thoughts by myself regarding each of the four different proposals:


Quote:

Originally Posted by MonctonRad (Post 5666476)
Further thoughts on the four different presentations for the downtown Moncton Events Centre:

Exp. Architects Inc.

http://www.moncton.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?vid=12126
Overview of events centre from Main/Highfield intersection

http://www.moncton.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?vid=12125
Looking towards mixed use part of the development on current parking lot.

http://www.moncton.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?vid=12124
Looking down Highfield St extension. There would be limited vehicular access, and the very end of the street would be occupied by a semi permanent stage for outdoor concerts and events.

This is easily the most modest of the four proposals, and therefore the most affordable and as such likely would be the closest to what will actually be built. I like the design of the arena, but I don't think putting condo units in the arena building itself, facing Main St is very practical. I also am not sure about closing off the end of the Highfield St extension and turning it into a hemmed off plaza. It would instead be better to open up the development some more, so that it is more inclusive of the railway lands in some way. It's also important to form a linkage to the lands south of the rail line. This would help to spur on development in the south end of the downtown

Architects Four

http://www.moncton.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?vid=12101
Overview of events centre as seen from Main/Highfield intersection. The arena itself is at the back end of the property with mixed retail/commercial in an attached building facing Main St. This proposal has a strong street presence.

http://www.moncton.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?vid=12103
Looking north from the CN tracks. Arena in the foreground. There is an attached convention facility (on the left), along the southwest corner of the arena building. The architects envisage extending both Weldon and Highfield, creating a street that would encircle the arena building.

http://www.moncton.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?vid=12104
Looking east from the Weldon/Main intersection. You can appreciate the strong street presence of the building on Main St. Also, in the distance you can see a large parking facility (and some apartments) on the other side of the CN tracks. I'm not sure how the parking structure is connected to the events centre, but a pedway would suffice. Again, you can see mixed use on the current Highfield square parking lot.

This is a very comprehensive proposal that leaves little else to be desired. It has it all. I really appreciate the street presence and, the inclusion of a convention centre and lots of commercial development should help with revenue streams to help finance the project. The commercial component of the building is so large that you might in fact even be able to lure the Bay into coming back! :) Putting a street completely around the events centre helps to integrate it into the rest of downtown and would help to stimulate development behind the Terminal Plaza buildings. The parking on the south end of the CN tracks is a very strong feature of this proposal. I like this a lot.....

Nadeau, Soucy, Ellis

http://www.moncton.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?vid=12132http://www.moncton.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?vid=12133
http://www.moncton.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?vid=12138
http://www.moncton.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?vid=12146

This is easily the weakest of the four proposals as far as I am concerned. My biggest complaint is that I found it all rather confusing and it took me some time to get my bearings with this proposal. The arena does not stand out from the other buildings and I don't like all the curves and offset levels in the buildings. I'm not sure what the function of that big pedway is. I imagine that the architectural complexity of this development would mean that it would be prohibitively expensive. This proposal is a non starter IMHO.

Architecture 2000

http://www.moncton.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?vid=12150
Overview showing the arena on the Highfield Square site, mixed use on the current parking lot, a public park to the south of the Terminal Plaza complex, the innovative transit hub on the south side of the CN line and interestingly, a redeveloped Aquillini block as well. I wonder if Raven Spanier has been talking to anybody in Vancouver! ;)

http://www.moncton.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?vid=12108
Looking south on Highfield. You can appreciate that Highfield will be extended across the CN tracks to provide access to the integrated transit hub. This would also help to integrate the south end of downtown to the rest of the core and help promote further development. The redeveloped Aquillini block is in the foreground.

http://www.moncton.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?vid=12113
Looking west up Main St. It would certainly be hard to miss the arena! :) This proposal also has a strong street presence on Main.

http://www.moncton.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?vid=12114
Looking east up Main St. The facade of the arena is certainly eyecatching and iconic.

This is by far the most ambitious of all of the proposals, especially when you consider the integrated transit facility. This probably puts it out of reach for budgetary reasons, but you never know. Federal money won't be available for the arena but could be available for public transit projects. A strong commercial component (including the Aquillini block) would also bring in more monies. This proposal would do the most to transform the downtown, but in the end might be less practical than the Architects Four proposal. Still, if money were no object, this proposal would be my choice.... :)


MonctonRad Jan 17, 2013 3:40 AM

#5 - pierremoncton posted this additional flyover animation of the Architecture 2000 proposal:


Quote:

Originally Posted by pierremoncton (Post 5672089)
Architecture 2000's downtown centre fly-over -- turn off the audio:

Video Link


Monctoncore Jan 17, 2013 4:24 AM

Event Centre
 
The thing I do like Architects 4's idea because its affordable design, but some changes would be, one the plaza, I find its just really bland, it doesn't look like a place people would want to gather around, I would like to see some color, it could use maybe a restaurant area/bar facing the plaza, some more statues and art work. Two The street presence isn't attractive at all needs entrances form Main st.... actually I guess i'm not a fan of it , if we could just incorporate bits of each would be awesome.

Architecture 2000's is by far the best, I think that it would be affordable if it was done in phases ( except the rail ). The whole project wouldn't be exactly the same, change the transit hub to something similar to the go transit rail crossing in Pickering.

http://i1321.photobucket.com/albums/...ps348379da.jpg

Bring that across to a redeveloped lot or parking garage/transit hub Codiac Transpo and it would look great. Basically my point it Architecture 2000's render is affordable especially if its tweaked a bit, but keeping the beautiful colours and art work like in the video.

Photo from the Pickering Go transit site.

magee_b Jan 17, 2013 8:44 AM

I find the North facing view of the Architects 4 proposal really telling. In the bottom right corner across Highfield you can see stairs leading down (underground parking / tunnel under the tracks?), also there appears to be some sort of patio features included in the design - on the upper level of the arena, on the roof of the convention centre space, and as well in the corner of the large plaza facing Highfield (possibly promoting the concept of a sports bar/restaurant). Overall a very practical concept and fitting to the area. I think I find the others unnecessarily flashy to the point of being unrealistic (but this is coming from a modest SJer). The designer also clearly put their attention on the arena alone, whereas my feeling on the others is that the add-ons (surrounding condos/transit centres/etc) are a bit of a distraction from the central purpose of a downtown events centre.

Peter_johnns Jan 31, 2013 3:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonctonRad (Post 5976515)
#3 - mctnguy provided this link to a youtube video of the presentation (very informative, a must see really):

Who wants to live in a hockey rink? Residential needs to be separated from the centre...if this or anything close to it ever even happens.

JHikka Jan 31, 2013 4:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_johnns (Post 5994537)
Who wants to live in a hockey rink?

There must be interest.

RyeJay Jan 31, 2013 4:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_johnns (Post 5994537)
Who wants to live in a hockey rink? Residential needs to be separated from the centre...if this or anything close to it ever even happens.

People aren't literally living in a hockey rink. :haha:
Welcome to the concept of mixed-use, urban living: Living close to sources of employment, to amenities, in a central location.

RedBall Jan 31, 2013 12:17 PM

I heard news that the City has just put this out as a Design-Build project instead of going with any of the Architect's proposals. Has anyone heard anything about this?

MonctonRad Jan 31, 2013 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedBall (Post 5994795)
I heard news that the City has just put this out as a Design-Build project instead of going with any of the Architect's proposals. Has anyone heard anything about this?

The renderings posted here were really nothing more than part of a visioning exercise. The last I heard was that the city had issued a "request for qualifications" from developers and this could have been structured as a design/build type of thing....

pierremoncton Feb 1, 2013 7:14 PM

Interesting article on the CBC:

Why funding new sports stadiums can be a losing bet
Building stadiums and arenas have little economic benefits for cities, research shows

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/...iums-cost.html

MonctonRad Feb 1, 2013 8:31 PM

:previous:

I read this article too.

There is no question that arenas and stadia can be overbuilt and can result in major fiscal embarrassment for their respective political jurisdictions, especially if things go overboard and they become architectural masterpieces or sports shrines. This sort of situation obviously should be avoided.

The fact remains however that the coliseum needs to be replaced. The roof is too low for major touring bands and their staging. The acoustics of the coliseum suck big time. The building also has essentially non existent A/C and this is a major problem for curling and hockey playoffs that can extend well into the late spring. If you put 7,000 sweaty people in there in late May, the ice can start to get soft pretty quick and it can be hard to see what's going on with all the ice fog in the air!

Another issue is ice time availability for the Wildcats during the QMJHL playoffs. The coliseum is heavily booked with trade shows in the late winter and the spring and this has caused major scheduling problems if the Cats make a deep playoff run. God forbid if the Miracles also had a successful playoff season! :eek:

The existing infrastructure is old and capacity issues are becoming more and more problematic every single year. We need a new arena. That is self evident. It is also obvious that it should be built downtown in order to maximize economic benefit and to kickstart redevelopment in the core.

A new events centre must be built. It is important that we are prudent in what is constructed. It doesn't need to be an architectural masterpiece, but it should be "right sized" so that it can serve as an appropriate hockey venue for the playoff crowds and is also able to attract major touring acts. I think 10,000 seats is about right.

It is also important to realize that we are talking about much more than a rink here. We are talking about a mixed use development that will give the critical mass needed to stimulate years of future growth in the west end of downtown. Components could include retail, restaurants, condos, apartments, a transit hub, a small convention centre and possibly a new civic library. In the end, the arena itself may be no more than half of the development and perhaps lots less.

The CBC article makes good points, but in many ways, it misses the point as far as our proposed events centre is concerned......

RyeJay Feb 1, 2013 9:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pierremoncton (Post 5996920)
Interesting article on the CBC:

Why funding new sports stadiums can be a losing bet
Building stadiums and arenas have little economic benefits for cities, research shows

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/...iums-cost.html

They wouldn't be a losing bet, if municipalities and provinces weren't also wasting money subsidising suburbs, towns, and villages with roads, water/sewer, schools, hospitals, police and fire protection, for which their low-density tax revenues do not come close to paying...

I'm not going to support the rhetorical talking point of 'a downtown events centre must be built' -- because, clearly, it doesn't. What does have to happen is an inversion of Moncton's economic growth. It must turn inward, so the City may use the infrastructure it already has, so that growth in Moncton doesn't necessitate putting more roads and public services on the credit card.

MonctonRad Mar 15, 2013 1:08 PM

I was watching some of the World Figure Skating Championships on TV the other night.

The event is being held at the Budweiser Gardens in London Ontario. This is a facility held up by many as an example to emulate for our own proposed downtown events centre.

I must admit that the arena seems very impressive, with a full second tier of seating around the entire ice surface and it appears to have excellent sight lines throughout. Apparently the seating capacity for the arena in 9,090 for ice hockey, but somewhat greater for other events. On TV, it looks much bigger than it's stated size, almost a mini Air Canada Centre.....

I do think that this is a facility that we should use as an example for our own downtown centre. It has apparently been very successful at attracting major events and has been an engine for downtown revitalization in London.

The website is http://www.budweisergardens.com/

There are integrated bars and restaurants in the facility. With our own Molson/Coors brewery in town, I wonder what the potential is here for major tie ins, corporate support and for naming rights.....

BlackYear Mar 15, 2013 2:20 PM

Yes, the Budweiser Gardens is the formerly known John Labatt Centre, which we have already made suggestions on this site last year, which would be a good model for the Moncton Downtown Events Centre.

I even made this little things...'memba! I took the Labatt Centre and dropped in nicely in this spot. :)

http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j3...n/arena3-1.jpg

Mattyyy Mar 15, 2013 2:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonctonRad (Post 6052810)
I was watching some of the World Figure Skating Championships on TV the other night.

The event is being held at the Budweiser Gardens in London Ontario. This is a facility held up by many as an example to emulate for our own proposed downtown events centre.

I must admit that the arena seems very impressive, with a full second tier of seating around the entire ice surface and it appears to have excellent sight lines throughout. Apparently the seating capacity for the arena in 9,090 for ice hockey, but somewhat greater for other events. On TV, it looks much bigger than it's stated size, almost a mini Air Canada Centre.....

I do think that this is a facility that we should use as an example for our own downtown centre. It has apparently been very successful at attracting major events and has been an engine for downtown revitalization in London.

The website is http://www.budweisergardens.com/

There are integrated bars and restaurants in the facility. With our own Molson/Coors brewery in town, I wonder what the potential is here for major tie ins, corporate support and for naming rights.....


I looked this up on wikipedia and it states the building was completed in 2002 at a cost of $42,000,000 plus $10,000,000 for the land. If Moncton ends up building an arena with less than 10,000 seats, I have to say I think this is an excellent design. Despite its size, it has a large stadium look to it.

Looking forward to any developments on the downtown events center in 2013!

MonctonRad Mar 15, 2013 2:59 PM

Yes, I remember your proposal very well Budyser! :)

http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j3...n/arena3-1.jpg

Back when we were discussing the proposed events centre on the main Moncton thread, and before the city optioned the Highfield Square site, the area behind Assomption Place was a legitimate contender as a site for the events centre, and a favourite candidate amongst many members on the forum.

I still think that in some ways, this location would have done more for densification of the core and creating a true downtown focus than the Highfield Square site, but it was always a dilemma. The Highfield Square site will be more versatile and will certainly rejuvenate the west end of downtown......

BlackYear Mar 16, 2013 2:44 PM

And speaking of the Budweiser Gardens, News91.9 published this yesterday...

http://www.news919.com/2013/03/15/sy...ncton-planned/

Symposium on future of downtown Moncton planned

Reps from London, Ont. will discuss entertainment centre’s affects in their community

Tara Clow Mar 15, 2013 01:49:32 PM

MONCTON, N.B. – The future of downtown Moncton will be the focus of a symposium planned for next month.

Downtown Moncton Centre-ville Inc. has invited representatives from London, Ontario to help provide details on their struggles and what they gained from building an entertainment centre ten years ago.

President Louis Leger says DMCI shares their vision.

“We have invited them to share with us first of all, how they went about building their centre, and what the centre has done. They have almost doubled the value of their downtown.”

The City of Moncton has not signed on the dotted line for a downtown entertainment centre just yet.

They have until June to do so, but Leger says this might help give them the extra push to move ahead.

The symposium is planned for the morning of April 17th.

MonctonRad Mar 16, 2013 2:51 PM

Speaking of the Budweiser Gardens in London......

Downtown Moncton Centreville has announced a community symposium to be held at 7:30 AM on Wednesday April 17th at the Capitol Theatre. The guest speakers will be the director of the Budweiser Gardens and the executive director of Downtown London Inc.

They will be speaking on how transformative the London events centre has been for their downtown since it opened in 2002. Apparently downtown tax valuation in London has doubled in the last 10 years, in large part due to the presence of this important facility.

Despite the ungodly hour, everyone is invited to attend this symposium.......

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Also:

The deadline for the request for qualifications for the new events centre passed yesterday. Apparently "multiple proposals" were received. City hall staffers will now review the proposals in detail and those companies that are felt to be qualified will be invited to submit a formal RFP for the project. if the city decides to proceed, this RFP will likely be issued in the fall.

The option for the city to buy the Highfield Square property will expire in June. A decision on whether to proceed with the purchase is expected in May.

Louis Leger, the president of DMCI is pressuring the city administration to proceed quickly with all this. According to him, several "very significant projects" on adjacent pieces of property are awaiting a formal announcement by the city as to it's intentions.

As had been stated before, the events centre itself might be $100-150M, but by proceeding, an additional $100-150M of private investment might also be stimulated by this project.

Downtown Saint John will soon be transformed by the redevelopment of the coast guard site. The Moncton downtown events centre will be our own equivalent project. This is a critical time for our city. We can not let this opportunity pass by..... :yes:

EDIT - sorry Budyser, I see that you beat me to it by several minutes. If I had seen your post, I would have modified mine somewhat. I didn't mean to steal your thunder..... :)

RyeJay Mar 17, 2013 4:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonctonRad (Post 6054298)
Louis Leger, the president of DMCI is pressuring the city administration to proceed quickly with all this. According to him, several "very significant projects" on adjacent pieces of property are awaiting a formal announcement by the city as to it's intentions.

As had been stated before, the events centre itself might be $100-150M, but by proceeding, an additional $100-150M of private investment might also be stimulated by this project.

Downtown Saint John will soon be transformed by the redevelopment of the coast guard site. The Moncton downtown events centre will be our own equivalent project. This is a critical time for our city. We can not let this opportunity pass by..... :yes:

Speculation makes for a weak proposal. Hoping for an equal level of spin-off investments is, perhaps, wishful thinking. If Louis Leger wanted to correct this, and make a more serious assertion for why the downtown events centre should be built, he could easily be more forthcoming with numbers.

I support this downtown development, but I am also aware of the economic environment in which this events centre must try to survive after all of this money is spent on building it.

Residential and commercial development is still going to favour chearper, non-downtown site options. The City of Moncton still hasn't implemented a plan for enforcing sustainable development practices. Business park and suburban expansion is literally an economic nightmare in Moncton. This downtown events centre requires a steady pace of residential and commercial growth around it in order to make the centre financially solvent, to avoid any need for municipal and provincial (federal) subsidies, which is a real possibility if the downtown cannot attract enough residents to produce regular users of this facility.

I'm nervous about the foundational steps that haven't been taken to support this centre in the long-term. I don't except the frivolous Times&Transcript to cover any of this, but I hope to god that the CBC will...

MonctonRad Mar 18, 2013 3:52 PM

Moncton multipurpose complex inches closer to reality

Pedway linking former Highfield Square mall to federal building torn down
CBC News Posted: Mar 18, 2013 12:21 PM AT Last Updated: Mar 18, 2013 12:19 PM AT

http://www.cbc.ca/gfx/images/news/ph...edway-gone.jpg
Main Street looks different after the Highfield Square pedway was torn down over the weekend. (Kate Letterick/CBC)

Highfield Square closing The pedway linking Highfield Square with the federal building in Moncton was torn down over the weekend, but the former mall won't be demolished any time soon, says the mayor.

The city still has a lot of work left to do in its quest to build a multipurpose sports and entertainment centre at the site first, said George LeBlanc.

That includes buying the Highfield Square land on Main Street, securing funding for the project and putting out a request for proposals, he said.

"That's where companies who have made the shortlist will have an opportunity to put their proposals forward to the city to define what they can do and what could be contemplated in a downtown center and so there's significant milestones that are coming up that we'll be looking at," said LeBlanc.

The removal of the pedway has got people talking about the project again, said Anne Poirier Basque, the executive director of Downtown Moncton.

"It certainly means that there's movement and that there is change coming to our downtown," she said.

The city hit a small milestone in the project on Friday with the deadline for request for qualifications to see which companies are interested in the project.

If the project goes ahead as planned, it's not expected to open before 2017.

The Highfield Square location was selected as the best option for a new multipurpose complex last year, based on site characteristics, location and transportation; costs of acquiring development land; urban context and physical elements; and economic impact and synergy with the downtown.

The former mall closed in the fall.

A new downtown event centre could cost $100 million to construct, city officials have said.

Moncton politicians have been talking about replacing the aging Moncton Coliseum for several years.

NBNYer Mar 18, 2013 4:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyyy (Post 6052875)
I looked this up on wikipedia and it states the building was completed in 2002 at a cost of $42,000,000 plus $10,000,000 for the land. If Moncton ends up building an arena with less than 10,000 seats, I have to say I think this is an excellent design. Despite its size, it has a large stadium look to it.

Looking forward to any developments on the downtown events center in 2013!

That seems really cheap. Why is Moncton's proposal more than double the cost, for what seems to be a comparable bulding? Maybe it's not?? I've never been to Budweiser Gardens.

MonctonRad Mar 18, 2013 4:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NBNYer (Post 6056375)
That seems really cheap. Why is Moncton's proposal more than double the cost, for what seems to be a comparable bulding? Maybe it's not?? I've never been to Budweiser Gardens.

Budweiser Garden opened in 2002. They likely won't be breaking ground in Moncton until 2016 at the earliest. That's 14 years worth of inflation. I imagine that's the principle reason for the cost discrepancy.

JHikka Mar 18, 2013 4:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonctonRad (Post 6056390)
Budweiser Garden opened in 2002. They likely won't be breaking ground in Moncton until 2016 at the earliest. That's 14 years worth of inflation. I imagine that's the principle reason for the cost discrepancy.

According to this inflation calculator $52 million (42+10) would equal $64 million in 2013 money. So, there's $36 still missing somewhere. :P

MonctonRad Mar 18, 2013 4:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JHikka (Post 6056400)
According to this inflation calculator $52 million (42+10) would equal $64 million in 2013 money. So, there's $36 still missing somewhere. :P

I think the inflation rate for construction materials and labour is a tad higher than the general inflation rate....

Being in health care, I know that our inflation rate is a lot higher than the general rate. ;)

Chadillaccc Mar 18, 2013 11:35 PM

Someone should definitely post this in the Canada section! How exciting! A arena that big could have AHL!

Is it an arena/convention centre mix deal?

MonctonRad Mar 19, 2013 1:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chadillaccc (Post 6057112)
Someone should definitely post this in the Canada section! How exciting! A arena that big could have AHL!

Is it an arena/convention centre mix deal?

Actually, Moncton did have an AHL team for a long time. The Moncton Hawks played at the current coliseum and actually won the Calder Cup one year. They moved on in the early 1990's and were replaced by the Moncton Wildcats of the QMJHL. The Cats have also been successful, having been to the Memorial Cup twice.

This is proposed as being a multifunction centre, and might possibly have a small comvention centre associated with it. Retail, restaurants, pubs, relocation of the civic library, a hotel and a new transit hub have also been suggested.

This is still early days and nobody knows exactly what will be included in the project yet, but there seems to be a consensus that the minimum seating capacity should be 10,000.

NBNYer Mar 19, 2013 1:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chadillaccc (Post 6057112)
Someone should definitely post this in the Canada section! How exciting! A arena that big could have AHL!

Is it an arena/convention centre mix deal?

I think it has been posted in the Canada section as this thing has been floating around for some time... and it's still far from a done deal. One of the proposals (by Architects 4), which is my personal favorite, does include some convention space. I'm not sure about the others.

It would be hugely transformative for the west end of downtown as all proposals contain significant residential and commercial components. Downtown is currently pretty stagnant and seeing minimal development in comparison with the suburban areas. The hope is that this would kick start a renewal in the area by making it more appealing for other developments and investments opportunities.

MonctonRad Mar 19, 2013 3:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NBNYer (Post 6057270)
I think it has been posted in the Canada section as this thing has been floating around for some time... and it's still far from a done deal. One of the proposals (by Architects 4), which is my personal favorite, does include some convention space. I'm not sure about the others.

It would be hugely transformative for the west end of downtown as all proposals contain significant residential and commercial components. Downtown is currently pretty stagnant and seeing minimal development in comparison to the suburban areas. The hope is that this would kit start a renewal in the area by making it more appealing for other developments and investments opportunities.

I agree with NBNYer, the Architects Four conceptual proposal was my favourite as well. In case you didn't see it, here is an image of their proposal...

http://www.moncton.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?vid=12104

OUIR@random Mar 19, 2013 1:25 PM

Ok, I get it, we all want a new Downtown Events Centre, but why are we comparing ourselves with London, Ontario? A city with a population of 365K
and a metro area of 465K ??? They certainly don't have the same tax base as we do? :shrug:

JHikka Mar 19, 2013 1:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OUIR@random (Post 6057689)
Ok, I get it, we all want a new Downtown Events Centre, but why are we comparing ourselves with London, Ontario? A city with a population of 365K
and a metro area of 465K ??? They certainly don't have the same tax base as we do? :shrug:

Because they built a similar type facility to the one that Moncton wants to build.

OUIR@random Mar 19, 2013 1:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JHikka (Post 6057692)
Because they built a similar type facility to the one that Moncton wants to build.


Mmmm, I don't think that answered my question. How is this sustainable? Who is expected to pay for this and how is a city 5 times smaller expected to make this realistic? We all want this for Moncton, but I truly believe that this will put Moncton in a financial mess. We should go big, but this big?

NBNYer Mar 19, 2013 2:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OUIR@random (Post 6057697)
Mmmm, I don't think that answered my question. How is this sustainable? Who is expected to pay for this and how is a city 5 times smaller expected to make this realistic? We all want this for Moncton, but I truly believe that this will put Moncton in a financial mess. We should go big, but this big?

I kinda wonder why London went the size they did with their centre. It could have been larger for a city that size. Moncton built an arena with a nearly 7000 capacity 40 years ago when the city was half the size it is today. I don't think a facility in the 9000-10,000 range is out of reach, and frankly I think anything less is a missed opportunity, especially considering the recent and projected demographic growth.

MonctonRad Mar 19, 2013 2:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NBNYer (Post 6057729)
I kinda wonder why London went the size they did with their centre. It could have been larger for a city that size. Moncton built an arena with a nearly 7000 capacity 40 years ago when the city was half the size it is today. I don't think a facility in the 9000-10,000 range is out of reach, and frankly I think anything less is a missed opportunity, especially considering the recent and projected demographic growth.

Quoted for truth.

There is an excellent editorial in today's T&T about this. When I have a chance, I may try and repost it here........

JHikka Mar 19, 2013 3:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OUIR@random (Post 6057697)
Mmmm, I don't think that answered my question. How is this sustainable? Who is expected to pay for this and how is a city 5 times smaller expected to make this realistic? We all want this for Moncton, but I truly believe that this will put Moncton in a financial mess. We should go big, but this big?

Moncton should go big for the reasons that both MonctonRad and NBNYer have listed. Getting that 10K threshold opens up opportunities for a plethora of more events. Events like The Brier require there to be at least 8/10K capacity. Music concert tours often set 10K as a minimum capacity. Etc., etc. If you go small (7/8K) you're voluntarily closing yourself off to events that otherwise would consider Moncton in a heartbeat.

JasonL-Moncton Mar 19, 2013 3:24 PM

Adding 2K more seats than already exist at the coliseum is a virtual waste of money if we don't reach that 'magic threshold' that promoters and booking agents look at for venues.

We need a 10,000 permanent seat venue to grow into, like we grew into and out of the coliseum.

BlackYear Mar 19, 2013 3:31 PM

I really don't see any more need or reasons to explain why Moncton needs a 10,000 seat facility. Arguments for something smaller or bigger is a complete waste of time.

Can we move on please. :rolleyes:

NBNYer Mar 19, 2013 3:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Budyser (Post 6057838)
I really don't see any more need or reasons to explain why Moncton needs a 10,000 seat facility. Arguments for something smaller or bigger is a complete waste of time.

Can we move on please. :rolleyes:

Move on to what? Unless you managed to find some real info regarding the events centre, we unfortunately currently don`t have much to move on to :haha:

This is the Moncton Events Centre thread after all, where the tiniest detail about this still unconfirmed project is to be discussed ad nauseum


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.