SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   City Compilations (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=87)
-   -   CHICAGO | Highrise Projects & Construction, v7 (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=218289)

Jibba Dec 10, 2020 6:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kumdogmillionaire (Post 9129584)
Lol, I'll tell all those alpine forests in the Rocky's, Alps, Andes, and Himilayas that the altitude is too high for the trees to exist. There are plenty of reasons not to grow trees in the blow through floor though

Not often planted on roof decks. Also, see the felled trees from the derecho this past Summer -- one sailing down from ~1,000 ft. up could be deadly.

ardecila Dec 10, 2020 7:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcp (Post 9129659)
Hot take ardecelia - trees are way tougher than some altitude..for God's sake...get those trees a trauma-llamma

On the mountains those trees are exposed to wind on one side, not all four as in St Regis' blow-thru floor (wind exposure is why ridgelines are often bare). And they live in real soil and get real rain, not some pipsqueak planter box with a drip irrigation system.

Zapatan Dec 10, 2020 10:49 PM

West Loop Skyscraper to Further the Isolation of Kennedy Expressway

Quote:

Last week we learned two interesting things. First, the correct 12 Days of Christmas lyric is “Four colly birds,” not “Four calling birds.” Colly bird is a dusty term for any random blackbird. And second, Crescent Heights wants to put up a 47-story residential tower at 640 West Washington Boulevard, on the eastern edge of the Kennedy Expressway.
https://www.chicagoarchitecture.org/...dy-expressway/

Toasty Joe Dec 10, 2020 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zapatan (Post 9130406)
West Loop Skyscraper to Further the Isolation of Kennedy Expressway



https://www.chicagoarchitecture.org/...dy-expressway/

it says it's a December 2020 rendering but I believe that's the old scheme for the Equinox... won't it be 2 towers and slightly shorter?

Zapatan Dec 10, 2020 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toasty Joe (Post 9130443)
it says it's a December 2020 rendering but I believe that's the old scheme for the Equinox... won't it be 2 towers and slightly shorter?

Thought it looked familiar, guess we can disregard that. I think it's currently a 550 and 250 foot buildings but I'm not sure the status on it.

rgarri4 Dec 10, 2020 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toasty Joe (Post 9130443)
it says it's a December 2020 rendering but I believe that's the old scheme for the Equinox... won't it be 2 towers and slightly shorter?

Yep. Rendering should look like this:

https://images2.imgbox.com/60/06/dGUOlJWz_o.jpg

Toasty Joe Dec 12, 2020 3:09 AM

hopefully our turn for a SHoP project will be a 1200ft+ thompson center redevelopment... they're on a streak with proposals in Rotterdam (722') and Toronto (1017')

rlw777 Dec 12, 2020 5:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toasty Joe (Post 9131754)
hopefully our turn for a SHoP project will be a 1200ft+ thompson center redevelopment... they're on a streak with proposals in Rotterdam (722') and Toronto (1017')

A long while ago I was hoping with their experience designing tall buildings that integrate with existing historical structures that SHoP might be tapped for the hotel addition to the Reid Murdoch Building. But it seems that ship has sailed.

r18tdi Dec 14, 2020 10:47 PM

I'd love to see a SHoP project here. They were OPC finalist, but I don't think they've built anything in Chicago.

BVictor1 Dec 15, 2020 1:31 AM

1450 N. Dayton
 
1465-1483 N. Kingsbury St

On this Thursday's Plan Commission (12/17/20)

The Shops at Big Deahl, LLC, for the property generally located at 1465-1483 N. Kingsbury St./835-919 W. Blackhawk St./1450-1472 N. Dayton St. The applicant proposes to amend Planned Development 1292 to rezone the property to C2-5 prior to re-establishing Residential-Business Planned Development 1292, as amended the proposal will include five subareas with four structures and open space. Subarea A will consist of a 27-story (299 ft.), 327 dwelling unit building with retail and 110 parking spaces. Subarea B will consist of a 5-story (64 ft.), 36 dwelling unit building with 36 parking spaces. Subarea C will consist of a 10-story (117 ft.), 126 dwelling unit, group living classified as co-living building (max. 432 beds) with 41 parking spaces.


https://uniim1.shutterfly.com/ng/ser...995385/enhance

https://uniim1.shutterfly.com/ng/ser...995425/enhance

https://uniim1.shutterfly.com/ng/ser...995430/enhance

https://uniim1.shutterfly.com/ng/ser...995464/enhance

https://uniim1.shutterfly.com/ng/ser...995609/enhance

Toasty Joe Dec 15, 2020 3:08 AM

oof - design on Building A is bleak. Not a big fan of the stepped/rotated building sections on some modern highrise designs... the old 1000M proposal was the best I've seen and the verticality of the building helped there. The contemporary facade and slew of materials on this already look dated. I guess I like the rust color against the gray/black buildings in the plan and the existing black/glass buildings nearby, but could be achieved with a tall brick highrise... actually wouldn't mind seeing some "Fultonization" here

Bonsai Tree Dec 15, 2020 4:28 AM

^^It's much better than building C. Building C feels like they weren't even trying. I can already see the cement panels on it feeling weathered in 2 years. It'll look horrible.

the urban politician Dec 15, 2020 2:25 PM

I’ll take it all. Whole area needs to be transformed

west-town-brad Dec 15, 2020 2:59 PM

the small building likely segregates the affordable housing units from the luxury tower(s)

ardecila Dec 15, 2020 3:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by west-town-brad (Post 9134183)
the small building likely segregates the affordable housing units from the luxury tower(s)

It does that but there is also a whole 33-unit townhouse development planned for Harrison and Francisco on the West Side that will satisfy this project's affordable requirements.

jc5680 Dec 17, 2020 4:08 AM

167 Green


Bombardier Dec 17, 2020 11:45 AM

^that turned out nice. I haven’t been by there in awhile, but I like how the building looks from the Kennedy.

ardecila Dec 17, 2020 3:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bombardier (Post 9136247)
^that turned out nice. I haven’t been by there in awhile, but I like how the building looks from the Kennedy.

The wider sidewalks are nice. Halsted is too important a street to have those narrow-ass sidewalks.

r18tdi Dec 17, 2020 6:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BVictor1 (Post 9133787)
1465-1483 N. Kingsbury St

Approved

the urban politician Dec 17, 2020 6:27 PM

^ Awesome, now we just need demand to (fingers crossed) come roaring back some day so that many of these approved projects in the pipeline can get started

And damn it, I want to come downtown to watch a show. It’s been too damn long! :(


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.