Quote:
I'm new to the thread as well. What was Will's proposal? |
Quote:
The plan is to get Caltrans to complete a feasibility study on whether taller buildings can be constructed closer to SAN than previously allowed. Why Caltrans? Because they are the actual decision makers, not the FAA. The FAA can set guidances, but it's state and local agencies that are enforcers to address liability concerns. We'd need to run a state bill to secure funds for Caltrans to complete the study first. The study will very likely show that modest height increase are permissible. Couple that with downtown interests pressing for more height, Caltrans would then have no excuse to not increase the height limit. It's not a clearcut path, and there are multiple pitfalls, but it's a better option than waiting for SAN to move to Miramar lol |
La Jolla Commons 3 is UC
But..... Its booooring. Looks to be just another triplet of what is already there and only 11 floors lajollacommons3.com.
Oh well its something but extremely bland and short :uhh: As far as UTC goes I see Costa Verde being discussed a few posts back. I don't see where there are any parcels left for towers at CV. You aren't referring to the tearing out of the retail and the Biotech Office Space and hotel those aren't towers?? So where could more towers possibly go in that area:shrug: |
Quote:
The retail complex south of the parking lot will be some midrise biotech offices, which I think got permitted late last year. Waste of space IMO, but whatever. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
http://costaverdecenter.com/our-visi...Regents%20Road.
Here's the details on the Costa Verde Center redevelopment; looks like nothing above 6 or 7 stories. At least it comes with some improvements to the adjacent bike lanes and sidewalks. Perhaps we might see some of the UTC mall surface lots redeveloped into more towers a la Palisade. In fact there's been a bunch of construction work right next to Palisade, not sure what's going on there. I'll have to take a look later. |
Quote:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...83d7e77b_z.jpg Here's another fairly boring tower going up right now on Nobel Dr. that will be 17 floors. I'm just glad it's not another Mediterranean design because we have plenty of those. https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...e29a8bbe_z.jpg https://www.belmontvillage.com/locat...la-california/ Quote:
Quote:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...454b4ca7_z.jpg |
Thoughts on the hotel/observation tower for the Seaport San Diego development? I don't hate it. If only it were 100'-200' taller. More renderings in the link below.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...f2868b62_c.jpg https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...5f915cee_c.jpg https://www.abbapm.com/seaport-san-diego |
Well it's certainly unique as far as observation towers go.
|
Quote:
The top looks rather awkward, almost like a bunch of plates falling over after being stacked. Hopefully they refine it a bit. |
While the design definitely has its flaws, it brings something distinctive to the downtown skyline, which has been greatly lacking. Having a widely recognizable landmark in San Diego would certainly be good for the city's stature and help this place get out of being a second-rate American city.
|
Yeah, not huge on the stacked plates but perhaps it'll blend in better than the render. Renders tend to make things stand out more than usual. SD could use a landmark to give it character.
|
I like the unique design of it, but I’m worried about the height.
How tall will it be? That picture is very misleading because it’s over the water and makes it look like it will be significantly taller than the Hyatt which I don’t believe is the case? If it’s going to be the same height as the surrounding ~ 500 ft towers I think it will just look awkward. Something like that needs to stick out more to make an impact. Sorry to once again bring up the height limit, I know that’s a broken record on this forum, but this is one example where I think height limit makes the difference between iconic and awkward. |
https://www.seaportsandiegoca.com/up...-orig_orig.jpghttps://www.seaportsandiegoca.com/up...-orig_orig.jpg
The link shows two different tower designs. The one sandiego urban posted above and this one. Which is the most current? Either way, my comment about the height still applies. They make it look taller in these renderings than I think it will actually be - unless it will be 700 ft |
It looks like they’ve been tinkering with the design for awhile. I actually found this from a 2015 article .. SO GLAD this monstrosity was not considered, this would have made us the joke of the country
https://www.sdbj.com/news/2015/feb/0...town-waterfro/ This eyesore makes me thankful for the good quality towers we have going up now :D https://ocbj.media.clients.ellington...08e3fa67d9af9d |
@SDCAL:
The observation tower is going to be 500' tall. The angles are what make it look taller than the Hyatt. That said, viewing angles and foreshortening work in real life as well. The Space Needle, for example, isn't the tallest building in Seattle. It isn't even in the top five. But its location at the edge of downtown means that it looks taller and more prominent than it would be if it were closer to the center. The same might work here. The pics you posted are at least 3-4 years old. The tower had to be relocated because of a fault-line. The pics SD_Urban posted appear to be the most recent renderings I've seen. I don't see a date, but they look very close to a set of concept drawings made in 2019, which were the most recently released images until now. https://ca-times.brightspotcdn.com/d...11-2018-01.jpg |
Looks like the tax hike for the SD Convention Center expansion is not dead yet:
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com...ballot-measure |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.