SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum//index.php)
-   Skyscraper & Highrise Construction (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum//forumdisplay.php?f=103)
-   -   CHICAGO | 300 N Michigan Ave | 523 ft | 47 FLOORS (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum//showthread.php?t=240138)

the urban politician Aug 26, 2019 3:26 PM

CHICAGO | 300 N Michigan Ave | 523 ft | 47 FLOORS
 
New apartment/hotel proposal that is beginning site prep, demo of the old warehouse/loft building on site:

https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/d0wv...g_Package1.jpg via bKL

Quote:

A new tower near Millennium Park, developed by Sterling Bay and designed by bKL architects, came into clearer focus on Friday. Fresh details and renderings of the long-rumored project were shared by 42nd Ward Alderman Brendan Reilly who is asking residents for feedback on the plans so far.

Slated for the site of a vacant four-story building at 300 N. Michigan Avenue, the 47-story, 523-foot structure calls for 25,000 square feet of retail topped by 280 hotel rooms and 290 residential units. The tower would contain just 26 parking spaces in a below ground garage, suggesting the residential component is more likely rentals instead of condominiums.

Designed by Chicago-based bKL Architecture, the glassy, rectangular structure features inset balconies and pronounced horizontal striping at the lower hotel levels. Its most striking aspect is arguably an open-air loggia above the base, supported by angled M-shaped columns.
https://chicago.curbed.com/2019/3/25...e-sterling-bay

BonoboZill4 Aug 26, 2019 3:31 PM

This could be the last major change to that weird block. Everything else is either worthy of staying or too small to be torn down and made into something bigger. At least that's the way it looks to me

SIGSEGV Aug 26, 2019 4:40 PM

So many lambdas!

Busy Bee Aug 26, 2019 5:43 PM

It's an attractive enough tower albeit a bit boring, I just wish they could have acquired the low rise lot just to the north so they could have butted up and covered over that awful pomo-cold-storage-warehouse side wall of 320 N Michigan.

nomarandlee Aug 26, 2019 6:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Busy Bee (Post 8669368)
It's an attractive enough tower albeit a bit boring, I just wish they could have acquired the low rise lot just to the north so they could have butted up and covered over that awful pomo-cold-storage-warehouse side wall of 320 N Michigan.

True that. An ugly wall and a prominent location it is.
However from most angles, especially street level, I think and hope that the south side wall of 320 Michigan will mostly be obstructed than the renders depict.

AlpacaObsessor Sep 14, 2019 1:36 AM

300 N Michigan Demo Progress
https://i.imgur.com/lTsJtUnh.jpg

the urban politician Sep 14, 2019 1:32 PM

Thread bump just to mention that it’s been reported that demo of the existing building is about to start

SIGSEGV Sep 14, 2019 6:28 PM

On that note, if you want to see the carbon and carbide building from the top of the London House, better hurry up and make it to that cupola!

harryc Sep 16, 2019 12:22 AM

300 N Michigan
 
Sept 6

Does nobody thing of the pigeons ?




Sept 10


SolarWind Sep 24, 2019 3:22 AM

September 23, 2019




Busy Bee Sep 24, 2019 1:03 PM

That might just be a rare pigeon species. I demand an environmental impact statement. Also rare spiders on rare cobwebs.

Busy Bee Sep 24, 2019 1:06 PM

Also not to poo-poo too much, but this lot would have made an amazing location for a 1000 footer. The view up the river...:slob:

chicubs111 Sep 24, 2019 1:18 PM

I agree...such a prime lot to develop for something tall.. doesn't seem like much of a risk to go for something in the 700ft to 800 ft range for this location...just off Michigan avenue... :shrug:

kemachs Sep 24, 2019 1:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chicubs111 (Post 8696490)
I agree...such a prime lot to develop for something tall.. doesn't seem like much of a risk to go for something in the 700ft to 800 ft range for this location...just off Michigan avenue... :shrug:

So goes several high-profile sites in Chicago lately...although the Salesforce tower upsets me more than this one. Part of me wishes both sites could sit this one out until the next cycle in the hopes of a more worthy proposal. BUT I suppose it could be worse, at least the designs (in a vacuum) are pretty decent? :shrug:

the urban politician Sep 24, 2019 3:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chicubs111 (Post 8696490)
I agree...such a prime lot to develop for something tall.. doesn't seem like much of a risk to go for something in the 700ft to 800 ft range for this location...just off Michigan avenue... :shrug:

Yeah, couple tens of million $$, not too much risk :rolleyes:

Steely Dan Sep 24, 2019 3:13 PM

in its entire history, the city of chicago has only seen towers 800' or taller constructed on 18 occasions. that's it, just 18 times.

99% of the highrises chicago has built over the centuries have been less than 800' tall.

expecting every single patch of land in downtown chicago to now sprout 800+ foot towers is way beyond unrealistic.

chicubs111 Sep 24, 2019 6:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the urban politician (Post 8696608)
Yeah, couple tens of million $$, not too much risk :rolleyes:

Depending on pricing and marketing there could be also tens of millions more in profit too with a larger building...acting like this location would be so far fetched and taking such a crazy risk at a taller building than what's gonna be built currently is pretty close minded... this isn't the south loop ...its a pretty prime location.

kemachs Sep 24, 2019 7:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steely Dan (Post 8696614)
in its entire history, the city of chicago has only seen towers 800' or taller constructed on 18 occasions. that's it, just 18 times.

99% of the highrises chicago has built over the centuries have been less than 800' tall.

expecting every single patch of land in downtown chicago to now sprout 800+ foot towers is way beyond unrealistic.

You right. However, doesn't it seem like we've seen significantly less 800'+ proposals since the crash of '08? Does it speak to local and national developers being less bullish on the market here, with a majority of proposals being more conservative, blueglass, semi-boring towers in the downtown area? The one place I'm seeing adventurous architecture is the West Loop. Now that I think of it, the current boom in that neighborhood may mean less 800+ footers; sucking up the demand for office and residential?

Steely Dan Sep 24, 2019 8:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kemachs (Post 8696991)
However, doesn't it seem like we've seen significantly less 800'+ proposals since the crash of '08?

no.

i'd say it's 100% the opposite.

chicago has never seen more 800' projects than it is right now.




chicago's 800+ footers have been built in 4 distinct building booms, with one outlier (park tower).


'69-'76: 5

- hancock
- chase
- aon
- sears
- WTP



'89-'90: 4

- franklin
- 900 N
- 2 Pru
- 311 S



2000: 1

- park tower



2009-2010: 3

- trump
- aqua
- legacy




2018-202?: 5 + 6 active proposals

- one bennet
- NEMA
- vista
- 110 N
- OCS


- tribune east
- 400 LSD 1
- 400 LSD 2
- LSE site I
- 1000M
- salesforce

the urban politician Sep 24, 2019 8:28 PM

^ Of which Salesforce is almost definitely a go since they have an anchor tenant, and 1000M is "Starting in October!" (or November....or December.....or never) perhaps


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.