:previous: I recall when One57 dominated the Central Park skyline.
|
|
Taken by me last Sunday
[IMG]http://imageshack.com/i/plbsAHLqjhttp://imageshack.com/i/plbsAHLqj[/IMG] |
Quote:
|
I'm not sure which I find more silly: complaining about tower's shadows in Manhattan or denying they actually exists? :shrug:
|
Quote:
It’s that nonsense that needs photographic evidence to help protect developers from frivolous roadblocks!! :hell: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
as many feared (or hoped) the skyscrapers being built around it would. It's the same Central Park everyone knows and loves, at least for those who like the park anyway. MAY 22, 2018 http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...2155_HDR01.jpg http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...2219320801.png http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...2509_HDR01.jpg http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...2617_HDR01.jpg http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...2937_HDR01.jpg http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...2937_HDR02.jpg |
|
Quote:
What you're seeing now is just a covering, not the actual glass, which will look like this... http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...hCDOt5.r11.JPG MAY 22, 2018 http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...052218_20b.JPG http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...052218_22b.JPG http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...052218_31b.JPG http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...052218_58b.JPG http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...052218_70b.JPG http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...052218_71b.JPG http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...052218_80b.JPG |
:previous: It looks like a mirror. :photographer:
|
https://www.instagram.com/p/BjH-7S0B...newyorkbestoff
https://scontent-iad3-1.cdninstagram...31946240_n.jpg https://www.instagram.com/p/BjFtzOYA...-by=jer_t_bear https://scontent-iad3-1.cdninstagram...34260736_n.jpg https://www.instagram.com/p/BjJIfsNn...y=chriscas2004 https://scontent-iad3-1.cdninstagram...81661440_n.jpg https://www.instagram.com/p/BjJD_dNh...osemary_jonesy https://scontent-iad3-1.cdninstagram...74238464_n.jpg |
:goodpost: Classic Gotham, NYguy. ;)
|
:cheers:
Quote:
|
|
I wonder why the designed this in a boxy shape? You would think they could have done anything with the top, but they left it flat. Strange.
|
Quote:
The original design was a very graceful building that elegantly curved to a pointed top with the cantilever integrated seamlessly. Then that got value engineered to basically the design we have today but with a spire. Then the spire got value engineered out and we're left with this boxy thing. A quality box, but still a box. |
|
:previous: I know the blue film is temporary, but I really like it. :tup:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 9:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.