![]() |
Quote:
But seriously, are there any actual chances of an MLB team? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Jared Cowley, KGW 11:15 AM. PDT September 21, 2017 http://www.kgw.com/sports/mlb/portla...says/477597839 Quote:
|
The league is using Portland to extort Oakland and Tampa into ponying up money to pay for new stadiums.
We are only a serious contender if we agree to spend 100's of millions of dollars on a new ballpark. I enjoy baseball. And I would love to watch an MLB game in Portland. But billionaire owners need to pay for their own fucking stadiums. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also, Portland still has $150 million set aside for a new baseball stadium thanks to Mayor Vera Katz over a decade ago to secure funds with Oregon to help finance a stadium. From what I hear, that would still apply today. |
Wow, the timing of that article is eerie/weirdly coincidental.
|
Quote:
If I am going to pay for an entertainment event (sports,music or otherwise) I expect to be directly entertained by that event. But if sitting in hard seats for three hours watching a bunch of grown men stand around in a field while washing down some greasy popcorn with a $10 miller is how some people want to spend time with their friends... more power to them. It's just not for me personally. |
^ LOL, yeah. Well, I like the flow of a game, how it can go slowly and then suddenly get really intense. I have a similar feeling about soccer as you do about baseball, but evidently that's not how most of Portland feels about it given the Timbers Army and the planned expansion...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Albina Vision presentation [34 MB] to the Design Commission.
|
I see the grain elevators along the river are still in place in that photo. I would think that any comprehensive design for that neighborhood would look at moving them further downriver and activating the riverfront as well. Given the fact that it is prime real estate the business case should be pretty darned good.
|
Quote:
Here is an article from 2016, which notes a $12M expansion to the elevator in 2012: https://fadedportland.wordpress.com/...ter-area-1977/ |
Quote:
It always seems so bizarre to me when abstract proposals like this woo people. Everyone has their own vision of how it might be to walk around. Imagine sitting down and looking at a newspaper in the 1960s. Here is what you would see: The New Minnesota Freeway! We now know what it is like walking/living there. It is awful. In the joint proposal the intersection of Broadway and Vancouver still has 6 lanes. There will be an equal or greater amount people driving through the neighborhood from the freeway. Both current and future Broadways are equally intolerable. What would actually improve the neighborhood, make it walkable, equitable, diverse, safe? Slide 21: a 10 block cap of I-5 absent of any on and off ramps? |
Quote:
Even if they do ever fall into disuse I'd still advocate for keeping them and doing something like Zeitz MOCAA in Cape Town. |
If this all happens, I am more than okay with this area not being used for a new baseball stadium. The only thing I might be sad about is the buildings on the south end of the Moda Center because it seems like it would really block the view of the Moda Center from downtown, and I like seeing it all lit up Blazers red.
|
Quote:
http://www.hrtb.no/sio-silo/ |
Brief article by Brian Libby on remaking the IRQ in the Albina Vision. If it's not already apparent, the ODOT plan appears to be antithetical to Rukaiyah Adams and the Albina Vision for inner N. Pland. The patchwork of non-functional caps ODOT will use for construction is the opposite of the continuous 10 block cap proposed by Adams. Here's Jonathan Maus from bikeportland.
|
Quote:
Your recollection of it's status within the Dreyfus realm, appears accurate. I recall at the time (circa late 90's-2000) being told it was an asset that was free and clear of any debt and was tremendous net revenue source for L-D. Maybe something will change as the Allen fortune distributes over the next few years and others have different/evolving visions for the area. Still a sizeable financial hump to clear, for a new development. Absorbing the cost of that new facility within the redevelopment budget probably will always be a killer, unless there is a sizable subsidy. Even Paul Allen who was known for pet projects not needed to pencil (EMP for example), didn't bite on this one. |
Quote:
|
On that topic, they're requesting a Pre-Application Conference to discuss a zone change:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Sorry the article's locked up, but this sounds like a step closer to possibly seeing the demise of this grain terminal? Such a prime waterfront area with great views.
Prominent waterfront property trades hands for a steal By Jon Bell – Staff Reporter, Portland Business Journal 7 hours ago The new owner of the former Louis Dreyfus Co. grain terminal north of the Steel Bridge is likely looking for a temporary user until the parcel can be sold or redeveloped. https://www.bizjournals.com/portland..._news_headline |
Quote:
No redevelopment is proposed at this time however there is an oversupply of grain storage. It also mentions that they are looking for an operational partner for at least the next few years when a better opportunity to sell/redevelop might come up. |
This would be an exceptionally hard site to redevelop. Most of the land in between the grain terminal and N Interstate is owned by Union Pacific, who I doubt are eager to sell it. Under Central City 2035 there's a 50' setback from the river that no new buildings could be placed in. Once you account for those constraints there's not a lot of site left.
|
Quote:
Granted, I wouldn't hold my breath for anything like this happening here, but I could see something like this happen if all the parties wanted to take on a major project like this. |
Quote:
As a bonus, passengers arriving would have a killer view of downtown. |
Quote:
Indeed, the recent WSDOT Ultra High-Speed Ground Transportation Study lists several scenarios in which Portland's HSR station is located at the Rose Quarter (plus one scenario putting it at the airport and another at the Expo Center, but none at the present Union Station). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Drawings [58 MB] for Analog at 1835 N Flint.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Albina Vision presentation [10 MB] to the Planning and Sustainability Commission.
The presentation starts about 10 minutes into this video: |
Quote:
|
The Design Commission is getting a briefing on the Albina Vision next week. Here's a memo and the supporting documents.
|
Off topic but Mac is nextportland still active moving forward?
|
I'm not sure
|
You've done such a fantastic job, it would be a shame to see it go.
|
It’s a great site would hate to see it go.. but I can imagine the time it takes.
|
Presentation [200 MB] to the Design and Historic Landmarks Commissions.
|
I think some of your questions might be answered by browsing through the larger package linked here:
Quote:
I think it's likely that the "Right of First Refusal" referenced in the presentation is Albina Vision Trust's right to buy the PPS Blanchard site, not a reference to who will live in the future developments. With that said, there are policies such as the N/NE Preference policy that are specifically designed to benefit people who have been displaced from N/NE Portland (very disproportionality Black people), while remaining in compliance with the Civil Rights Act. Lastly... I really don't want to be in the position of moderating a politics forum, so can I ask everyone to please stick to comments that directly relate to this development? |
Design Advice Request notice for Albina One, North of 253 N Broadway.
|
|
Not a bad addition of density there. Wish it were a little taller, but so it goes.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.