SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Austin (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=446)
-   -   Austin | 415 Colorado | 640 Feet | 47 Floors | U/C (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=240713)

The ATX Oct 18, 2019 3:11 PM

Austin | 415 Colorado | 640 Feet | 47 Floors | U/C
 
There was a post(s) about this being a potential tower site a while back - in the update thread probably. But it's official now because a site plan for a "high rise office tower" project named "Tower 5c" was filed this morning. Specific tower info is not yet available.

https://abc.austintexas.gov/web/perm...pertyrsn=91634


Here's the location from Streetview:

https://i.imgur.com/DOYt87X.png

We vs us Oct 18, 2019 3:14 PM

Adios to another lil chunk of the Warehouse District.

Jdawgboy Oct 18, 2019 3:26 PM

Yea, so long what little street activity is left along that side of Colorado. Used to be such a vibrant segment.

Syndic Oct 18, 2019 4:42 PM

Hmm, that is a little sad. I like that little stretch of Colorado. it's cozy. I don't get why they can't focus on developing the big-ass parking lot right next door.

Mopacs Oct 18, 2019 5:09 PM

Does this include the original Alamo Drafthouse building?

zrx299 Oct 18, 2019 6:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Syndic (Post 8721224)
Hmm, that is a little sad. I like that little stretch of Colorado. it's cozy. I don't get why they can't focus on developing the big-ass parking lot right next door.

Seriously.
Do we have to bulldoze every single block downtown and replace it with sterile glass boxes, soul-less lobbies, and $10 inward-facing coffee shops that cater only to the 9-5 crowd?

Not anti-development at all, but a quick glance at an up to date satellite photo shows plenty of surface lots that could/should be developed first.

We vs us Oct 18, 2019 6:28 PM

All those surface lots are being squatted on by Nate Paul.

Not even kidding.

GoldenBoot Oct 18, 2019 6:41 PM

Looks like Rudy Garza's engineering company is working on this building.

KevinFromTexas Oct 18, 2019 6:50 PM

That sucks. I love all the new high rises, but you have to maintain a balance in the neighborhood otherwise you're going to lose the original character of it so that it doesn't exist anymore. There are still significant vacant lots where high rises could go in that neighborhood. It's unlikely that any new lowrise buildings would be built on those lots, so it makes sense to focus on them for highrises instead. Give the neighborhood meaningful infill while maintaining the character that has been helping to support the new growth in the first place.

paul78701 Oct 18, 2019 8:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mopacs (Post 8721264)
Does this include the original Alamo Drafthouse building?

I would guess not. Walmart recently renovated and is occupying that building with their first tech incubator hub.

https://corporate.walmart.com/newsro...n-austin-texas
https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/n...-tech-hub.html

Jdawgboy Oct 18, 2019 10:18 PM

It would be one thing if they actually incorporated music/club venue space into the project but they won't. So piece by piece what was once a vibrant district with a ton of pedestrian activity is now only a shadow of it's former self.

Syndic Oct 19, 2019 2:23 AM

I'm a Yimby but I'm telling y'all, we need to make some demands of these developers. We need to assert some control over what they're building in place of these beloved establishments.

Jdawgboy Oct 19, 2019 4:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Syndic (Post 8721907)
I'm a Yimby but I'm telling y'all, we need to make some demands of these developers. We need to assert some control over what they're building in place of these beloved establishments.

Agreed:cheers:

paul78701 Oct 19, 2019 2:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Syndic (Post 8721907)
I'm a Yimby but I'm telling y'all, we need to make some demands of these developers. We need to assert some control over what they're building in place of these beloved establishments.

I understand where you're coming from in general, but in this case, Searsucker has been closed for a while. I like Lonesome Dove and Chinatown, but I don't know of anyone who thinks of them as beloved. Also, they do have other locations.

They do need to replace the loss of the restaurant/retail spots on the ground floor of their new building though. It would be irresponsible not to IMHO.

At least this building will likely make the ugly backside of 405 Colorado less visible.

StoOgE Oct 19, 2019 8:30 PM

Yeah, this block has been a graveyard for new bars for decades other than Chinatown. I agree we need to demand restraint and bars in all of these buildings.

George_Blume Oct 20, 2019 12:30 AM

I think you’re going to be excited.

The ATX Oct 20, 2019 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by George_Blume (Post 8722568)
I think you’re going to be excited.

Which properties other than 415 Colorado are involved? Can you say who the developer is? Gensler is apparently the architect. :)

chinchaaa Oct 20, 2019 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by George_Blume (Post 8722568)
I think you’re going to be excited.

Give us a hint, George!

George_Blume Oct 20, 2019 12:50 AM

I’m sure someone will find the elevations soon.

The ATX Oct 20, 2019 12:53 AM

^^^ That probably means they will be posted for AULCC as soon as next week.

Also, in two to four weeks we'll have some specific tower info like the floor count, use(s), developer, etc. after the formal site plan goes into review.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.