Next southern city to build a tower in the 85-100 story range
Leaving Miami out since they've already accomplished this feat; what southern city will be next to do this? Houston, Dallas, Atlanta, Austin or Nashville?
|
Considering that no US city outside of NYC and Chicago has ever built a skyscraper over 85 floors tall, it's not really a question of "next", but rather "first".
Here are the ten tallest american skyscrapers (outside of NYC & Chicago) by floor count, according to the SSP database: 1. Miami - panorama tower - 81 floors 2. Seattle - columbia center - 76 floors 3. Houston - 600 travis - 75 floors 4. LA - US bank tower - 73 floors 5. LA - Wilshire Grand - 73 floors 6. Dallas - BofA plaza - 72 floors 7. Houston - wells fargo plaza - 71 floors 8. Atlanta - westin peachtree - 70 floors 9. Detroit - ren cen marriott - 70 floors 10. Miami - aston martin - 66 floors My best guess says that Miami will probably be the first US city (outside of NYC & Chicago) to build an 85+ floor tower. Miami builds a lot of tall residential, and that kind of floor count will be easier to achieve in a residential tower (they typically have much lower floor-to-floor heights than office towers). |
Austin, if they can get the FAA clearance. They're booming, and the demand stems from big tech. Google, Indeed, whos next, Amazon? Facebook?
|
Quote:
|
Panorama Tower in Miami is tall for nothing. Really ugly building. It’s too bad it’s the city’s tallest. Never realized it had that high of a floor count though, since it’s only around 830’ or so to the roof.
|
Jacksonville. Then it will really outclass Toronto.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
^ the SSP and CTBUH databases both say 81 floors.
That's good enough for me. No database is perfect, but Wikipedia would be one of the very last databases I would trust when it comes to skyscraper stats. |
I voted for Atlanta but I doubt any of them get it any time soon. Atlanta at least has heavy rail and could support a denser core.
|
Quote:
https://austin.towers.net/two-towers...skyline-twice/ https://austin.towers.net/wp-content...l-1536x776.jpg |
My money would probably be on Austin too. There are TONS of tower cranes on the Nashville skyline, but our buildings tend to be within the 300-600 range.
|
It will have to be a tier 2 metro: Atlanta, Houston, Dallas, Miami. Very hard to see it happening in Austin or Nashville. Also, Charlotte should be an option, since it s probably far more likely to build a super-tall than Nashville. I chose Dallas, but I think that Houston is just as likely.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Houston, during the next oil boom.
I'll be shocked if Atlanta does it. I gotta hand it to Texas for getting three nominations, all plausible. It really is a powerhouse of economic activity. |
I voted Houston, just because it's extant towers are both the tallest and the most recent. Dallas and Atlanta haven't seen much high-rise growth at the top end of height in recent years (Houston is also dominated by 80s towers, but at least has a couple from recent years and one U/C).
Though, I understand its growth is a bit sluggish at the moment - so it likely won't happen until the next boom cycle. Austin and Nashville are growing like gangbusters right now, but conditions there are likely still a long way of from making an 85+ storey tower viable. They lack the corporate base for an office tower of that height; and lack the high land values for a residential tower. |
I'm betting no southern city will build that tall in the next ten years, if ever.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 8:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.