thenoflyzone |
Nov 4, 2019 2:35 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by zahav
(Post 8734188)
I am surprised that they are launching Rome before any Asian destination honestly, you'd think a Tokyo flight would be way more popular than Rome
|
WS wants to avoid launching a long haul route with a competitor already on it. Hence why you wont see YYC-NRT before say YYC-ICN. Also explains why they chose YYC-DUB, CDG and now FCO. If you're the only non stop carrier on a route, you can charge a premium for it, moreso than a route with a competitor, when you often times need to match the other's fare to better compete.
Quote:
Originally Posted by J81
(Post 8737168)
You answered your own question! All of those airports you just mentioned have flights to Tokyo ( PDX? Pretty sure but didnt check ). So if your goal is attracting connecting passengers from those cities then why serve a destination that PAX can get to without a connection?
|
LAX and SFO have/will have non stop to Rome as well come summer 2020. Connections help fill a flight, but mostly at trash fares (and therefore yields). O&D is where it's at. Hence why my comment about WS betting it all on YYC.
|